PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLH.DE vs. RENW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLH.DE vs. RENW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLH.DE achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than RENW.DE's 43.00% return.


ETLH.DE

1D
1.09%
1M
4.11%
YTD
0.49%
6M
1.45%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*

RENW.DE

1D
-1.77%
1M
4.00%
YTD
43.00%
6M
41.28%
1Y
80.41%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLH.DE vs. RENW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ETLH.DE
L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF
0.49%-0.43%8.79%17.72%-16.87%27.97%3.63%
RENW.DE
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF
43.00%35.27%-9.64%-11.30%-3.32%1.09%18.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLH.DE and RENW.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.63

The correlation between ETLH.DE and RENW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLH.DE vs. RENW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLH.DE
ETLH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ETLH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

RENW.DE
RENW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLH.DE vs. RENW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETLH.DERENW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.56

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

9.22

-8.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.96

34.50

-33.54

ETLH.DE vs. RENW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLH.DE and RENW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETLH.DERENW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

3.49

-3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.41

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.49

+0.07

Drawdowns

ETLH.DE vs. RENW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLH.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.60%, smaller than the maximum RENW.DE drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLH.DE and RENW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLH.DERENW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.60%

-43.93%

+16.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-8.63%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.70%

-35.00%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.37%

-42.30%

+15.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.50%

-3.64%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-17.33%

+9.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

2.31%

+2.58%

Volatility

ETLH.DE vs. RENW.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) is 4.00%, while L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that ETLH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RENW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLH.DERENW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

8.24%

-4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

16.85%

-6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

22.80%

-7.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

22.02%

-5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

22.48%

-4.99%

ETLH.DE vs. RENW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ETLH.DE and RENW.DE have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

ETLH.DE vs. RENW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLH.DE nor RENW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLH.DE and RENW.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETLH.DE and RENW.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

ETLH.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while RENW.DE is Energy Equities. ETLH.DE tracks Solactive eCommerce Logistics, while RENW.DE tracks Solactive Clean Energy.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLH.DE and RENW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer