ETLF.DE vs. ETLX.DE
ETLF.DE (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF) and ETLX.DE (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETLF.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity, while ETLX.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the DAXglobal® Gold Miners. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETLF.DE returned 12.26%/yr vs 23.41%/yr for ETLX.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETLF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ETLX.DE.
Performance
ETLF.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETLF.DE achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly higher than ETLX.DE's -2.30% return.
ETLF.DE
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 23.78%
- 6M
- 22.90%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- —
ETLX.DE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 6M
- 5.08%
- 1Y
- 60.19%
- 3Y*
- 46.63%
- 5Y*
- 23.41%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
ETLF.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETLF.DE L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF | 23.78% | 4.67% | 10.97% | -10.24% | 21.51% | 40.15% | -13.51% | 9.35% | -5.45% | 2.32% |
ETLX.DE L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | -2.30% | 152.55% | 27.41% | 11.05% | -7.10% | -3.32% | 12.25% | 42.55% | -5.79% | 3.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETLF.DE and ETLX.DE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2017 | 0.21 |
The correlation between ETLF.DE and ETLX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETLF.DE vs. ETLX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETLF.DE
ETLX.DE
ETLF.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETLF.DE | ETLX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 2.11 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 5.29 | +3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETLF.DE | ETLX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.33 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.64 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.23 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
ETLF.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETLF.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, smaller than the maximum ETLX.DE drawdown of -73.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLF.DE and ETLX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETLF.DE | ETLX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.78% | -73.44% | +44.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | -28.89% | +20.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | -28.89% | +12.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.00% | -42.03% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -24.71% | +19.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | -34.69% | +22.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 11.52% | -7.55% |
Volatility
ETLF.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) is 5.93%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that ETLF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETLX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETLF.DE | ETLX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 14.03% | -8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.60% | 35.22% | -18.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 45.70% | -26.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 36.04% | -18.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 33.83% | -18.24% |
ETLF.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETLF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ETLX.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETLF.DE vs. ETLX.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETLF.DE nor ETLX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETLF.DE and ETLX.DE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETLF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ETLX.DE.
ETLF.DE is categorized as Commodities, while ETLX.DE is Precious Metals. ETLF.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while ETLX.DE tracks DAXglobal® Gold Miners. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ETLF.DE and 0.65% for ETLX.DE.
Find the right allocation for ETLF.DE and ETLX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer