ETL2.DE vs. CMOE.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ETL2.DE (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) and CMOE.DE (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both Commodities funds - ETL2.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward while CMOE.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ETL2.DE returned 10.87%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for CMOE.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETL2.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CMOE.DE.

Performance

ETL2.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETL2.DE achieves a 18.23% return, which is significantly lower than CMOE.DE's 21.57% return.

ETL2.DE

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 18.23%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 27.69%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: 8.17%

CMOE.DE

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.55%
• YTD: 21.57%
• 6M: 21.82%
• 1Y: 33.83%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETL2.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETL2.DE L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF	18.23%	4.89%	11.54%	-9.44%	12.78%
CMOE.DE Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc	21.57%	14.96%	2.92%	-9.62%	-0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ETL2.DE and CMOE.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022	0.81

The correlation between ETL2.DE and CMOE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETL2.DE vs. CMOE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETL2.DE

ETL2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 57
ETL2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ETL2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ETL2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ETL2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ETL2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

CMOE.DE

CMOE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 63
CMOE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CMOE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CMOE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CMOE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
CMOE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETL2.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETL2.DE	CMOE.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.00	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.50	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.37	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	4.49	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.20	10.26	-2.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETL2.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETL2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the CMOE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETL2.DE and CMOE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETL2.DE	CMOE.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	2.00	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.37	-0.11

Drawdowns

ETL2.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETL2.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.04%, which is greater than CMOE.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETL2.DE and CMOE.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETL2.DE	CMOE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.04%	-29.97%	-17.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.90%	-7.70%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.06%	-11.83%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-5.48%	+1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.90%	-19.33%	-2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	3.38%	+0.08%

Volatility

ETL2.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) is 4.60%, while Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that ETL2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMOE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETL2.DE	CMOE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	5.18%	-0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.74%	15.26%	-2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.15%	17.28%	-2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.44%	16.62%	-1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.69%	16.62%	-2.93%

ETL2.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETL2.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CMOE.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETL2.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETL2.DE nor CMOE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETL2.DE and CMOE.DE in my portfolio?

ETL2.DE and CMOE.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETL2.DE or CMOE.DE?

On fees, CMOE.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETL2.DE or CMOE.DE?

CMOE.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ETL2.DE.

What is the main difference between ETL2.DE and CMOE.DE?

ETL2.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while CMOE.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ETL2.DE and 0.24% for CMOE.DE.