ETL2.DE vs. BCFU.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ETL2.DE (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) and BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - ETL2.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward while BCFU.DE tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETL2.DE returned 13.12%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for BCFU.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETL2.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for BCFU.DE.

Performance

ETL2.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ETL2.DE is traded in EUR, while BCFU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCFU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ETL2.DE having a 18.23% return and BCFU.DE slightly higher at 19.04%.

ETL2.DE

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 18.23%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 27.69%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: 8.17%

BCFU.DE

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 19.04%
• 6M: 20.49%
• 1Y: 30.38%
• 3Y*: 11.53%
• 5Y*: 13.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETL2.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETL2.DE L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF	18.23%	4.89%	11.54%	-9.44%	24.86%	46.17%	-7.55%	10.85%	-4.21%	1.43%
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	19.06%	5.83%	11.25%	-8.45%	23.71%	43.40%	-7.83%	9.25%	-3.00%	0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ETL2.DE and BCFU.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017	0.89

The correlation between ETL2.DE and BCFU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETL2.DE vs. BCFU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETL2.DE

ETL2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 57
ETL2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ETL2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ETL2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ETL2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ETL2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

BCFU.DE

BCFU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 74
BCFU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
BCFU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BCFU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BCFU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BCFU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETL2.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETL2.DE	BCFU.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.98	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.58	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	4.30	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.20	9.99	-1.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETL2.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETL2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the BCFU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETL2.DE and BCFU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETL2.DE	BCFU.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	1.98	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.76	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.62	-0.37

Drawdowns

ETL2.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETL2.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.04%, which is greater than BCFU.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETL2.DE and BCFU.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETL2.DE	BCFU.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.04%	-25.15%	-21.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.90%	-7.03%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.06%	-13.93%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.27%	-25.15%	+1.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-3.51%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.90%	-11.04%	-10.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	3.03%	+0.43%

Volatility

ETL2.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETL2.DE	BCFU.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	4.47%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.74%	12.82%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.15%	15.29%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.44%	16.95%	-1.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.69%	15.33%	-1.64%

ETL2.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETL2.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETL2.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETL2.DE nor BCFU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETL2.DE and BCFU.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, ETL2.DE and BCFU.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ETL2.DE or BCFU.DE?

On fees, ETL2.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETL2.DE or BCFU.DE?

ETL2.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFU.DE.

What is the main difference between ETL2.DE and BCFU.DE?

ETL2.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ETL2.DE and 0.34% for BCFU.DE.