ETJ vs. EELDX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ETJ (Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund) and EELDX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - ETJ is a Global Equity Income fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EELDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, ETJ returned 8.20%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for EELDX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETJ charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for EELDX.

Performance

ETJ vs. EELDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETJ achieves a -3.51% return, which is significantly lower than EELDX's 7.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ETJ having a 8.20% annualized return and EELDX not far behind at 8.03%.

ETJ

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -2.69%
• YTD: -3.51%
• 6M: -3.40%
• 1Y: 0.60%
• 3Y*: 9.15%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: 8.20%

EELDX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 18.77%
• 3Y*: 14.63%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: 8.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETJ vs. EELDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETJ Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund	-3.51%	3.49%	29.55%	14.15%	-22.74%	11.92%	22.31%	26.78%	-7.03%	18.93%
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	7.53%	15.80%	14.87%	11.46%	-6.14%	1.55%	7.44%	18.34%	-4.27%	13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ETJ and EELDX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.27

The correlation between ETJ and EELDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ETJ vs. EELDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETJ

ETJ Risk / Return Rank: 4
ETJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ETJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ETJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ETJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ETJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

EELDX

EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETJ vs. EELDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETJ	EELDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	5.54	-5.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	8.58	-8.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	2.45	-1.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.06	5.29	-5.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.22	21.52	-21.31

ETJ vs. EELDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the EELDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETJ and EELDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETJ vs. EELDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETJ drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, which is greater than EELDX's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETJ and EELDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETJ	EELDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.81%	-19.12%	-13.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-3.68%	-6.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.44%	-3.98%	-11.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.55%	-17.35%	-11.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.81%	-19.12%	-13.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-0.23%	-5.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.50%	-2.89%	-4.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	0.90%	+1.85%

Volatility

ETJ vs. EELDX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) at 0.78%. This indicates that ETJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EELDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETJ	EELDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	0.78%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.99%	3.06%	+5.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	3.51%	+7.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.60%	4.62%	+10.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.97%	4.72%	+13.25%

ETJ vs. EELDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETJ has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EELDX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETJ vs. EELDX - Dividend Comparison

ETJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, less than EELDX's 10.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	10.69%	9.44%	8.58%	9.02%	9.17%	7.87%	7.71%	7.86%	8.16%	7.90%	4.12%	1.65%
ETJ Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund	9.61%	8.86%	8.16%	8.86%	11.68%	8.53%	8.79%	9.77%	11.23%	9.82%	12.46%	10.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETJ and EELDX in my portfolio?

ETJ and EELDX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETJ or EELDX?

ETJ has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to EELDX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETJ dropped -32.81% vs EELDX's -19.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EELDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.54 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.