ETIIX vs. FXIEX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ETIIX (Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund) and FXIEX (PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, ETIIX returned 2.22%/yr vs 2.83%/yr for FXIEX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETIIX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FXIEX.

Performance

ETIIX vs. FXIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund (ETIIX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETIIX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than FXIEX's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ETIIX has underperformed FXIEX with an annualized return of 2.22%, while FXIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.83% annualized return.

ETIIX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.54%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 7.04%
• 3Y*: 4.13%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 2.22%

FXIEX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.85%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 6.56%
• 3Y*: 5.16%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 2.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETIIX vs. FXIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETIIX Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund	1.52%	6.11%	1.33%	6.52%	-6.62%	0.13%	6.29%	6.72%	0.31%	4.71%
FXIEX PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE	1.92%	3.37%	5.16%	8.92%	-10.89%	2.19%	7.22%	8.45%	1.00%	7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ETIIX and FXIEX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	0.71

The correlation between ETIIX and FXIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ETIIX vs. FXIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETIIX

ETIIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
ETIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ETIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ETIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ETIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
ETIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

FXIEX

FXIEX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FXIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FXIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FXIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FXIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FXIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETIIX vs. FXIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund (ETIIX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETIIX	FXIEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	2.37	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.28	4.14	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.58	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	3.40	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.49	11.23	-3.74

ETIIX vs. FXIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the FXIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETIIX and FXIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETIIX vs. FXIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETIIX drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, smaller than the maximum FXIEX drawdown of -15.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETIIX and FXIEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETIIX	FXIEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.72%	-15.25%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	-2.42%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.61%	-5.56%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.72%	-15.25%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.72%	-15.25%	+2.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	0.00%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-2.89%	+0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	1.65%	-0.71%

Volatility

ETIIX vs. FXIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund (ETIIX) is 0.71%, while PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that ETIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETIIX	FXIEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	0.92%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.01%	2.17%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61%	3.46%	-0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.17%	4.37%	-0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.08%	4.10%	-0.02%

ETIIX vs. FXIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETIIX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FXIEX's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETIIX vs. FXIEX - Dividend Comparison

ETIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than FXIEX's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETIIX Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund	3.41%	4.26%	3.91%	2.41%	2.10%	1.68%	2.65%	2.69%	2.17%	2.06%	1.96%	1.86%
FXIEX PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE	2.78%	2.75%	4.53%	3.98%	3.25%	2.63%	3.37%	3.63%	3.79%	2.67%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETIIX and FXIEX in my portfolio?

ETIIX and FXIEX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETIIX or FXIEX?

FXIEX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to ETIIX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETIIX dropped -12.72% vs FXIEX's -15.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.