ETIEX vs. FDLS
ETIEX (Eventide Exponential Technologies Fund) and FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) are both funds - ETIEX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Eventide Funds, while FDLS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Over the past 3 years, ETIEX returned 16.04%/yr vs 19.65%/yr for FDLS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETIEX charges 1.43%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for FDLS.
Performance
ETIEX vs. FDLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETIEX achieves a 23.67% return, which is significantly higher than FDLS's 13.12% return.
ETIEX
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 19.18%
- YTD
- 23.67%
- 6M
- 23.16%
- 1Y
- 35.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- —
FDLS
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETIEX vs. FDLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETIEX Eventide Exponential Technologies Fund | 23.67% | 8.94% | 2.52% | 31.96% | -21.33% |
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 13.12% | 22.47% | 7.41% | 20.70% | -1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETIEX and FDLS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ETIEX and FDLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETIEX vs. FDLS — Risk / Return Rank
ETIEX
FDLS
ETIEX vs. FDLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Exponential Technologies Fund (ETIEX) and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETIEX | FDLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 1.99 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.82 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 3.48 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 13.96 | -7.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETIEX | FDLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.99 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.86 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
ETIEX vs. FDLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETIEX drawdown since its inception was -53.83%, which is greater than FDLS's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETIEX and FDLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETIEX | FDLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.83% | -23.32% | -30.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.88% | -9.55% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.86% | -23.32% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.14% | -2.66% | -9.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.09% | -3.88% | -26.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 2.37% | +3.83% |
Volatility
ETIEX vs. FDLS - Volatility Comparison
Eventide Exponential Technologies Fund (ETIEX) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) at 4.36%. This indicates that ETIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETIEX | FDLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 4.36% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.31% | 12.45% | +6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.56% | 16.71% | +7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.92% | 19.07% | +13.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.47% | 19.07% | +14.40% |
ETIEX vs. FDLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETIEX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FDLS's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETIEX vs. FDLS - Dividend Comparison
ETIEX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETIEX Eventide Exponential Technologies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 0.11% |
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.86% | 7.26% | 0.97% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETIEX and FDLS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETIEX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to FDLS (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETIEX dropped -53.83% vs FDLS's -23.32%.
FDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETIEX and FDLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer