PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETIDX vs. FZAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETIDX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETIDX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETIDX achieves a 21.57% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 26.02% return.


ETIDX

1D
1.49%
1M
4.38%
YTD
21.57%
6M
20.04%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*

FZAMX

1D
0.68%
1M
6.78%
YTD
26.02%
6M
23.47%
1Y
42.35%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETIDX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETIDX
Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund
21.57%5.67%16.56%19.67%-21.77%31.98%25.38%27.07%-10.37%3.36%
FZAMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z
26.02%12.00%17.39%15.15%-14.70%25.40%18.84%23.85%-14.85%5.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ETIDX and FZAMX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2017

0.90

The correlation between ETIDX and FZAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETIDX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETIDX
ETIDX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ETIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ETIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FZAMX
FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETIDX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETIDX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETIDXFZAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

4.51

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

18.03

-6.92

ETIDX vs. FZAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the FZAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETIDX and FZAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETIDX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETIDX drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum FZAMX drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETIDX and FZAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETIDXFZAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.12%

-42.32%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.60%

-9.77%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.51%

-25.24%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.11%

-25.24%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-6.06%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.44%

-0.08%

Volatility

ETIDX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison

Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETIDX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) have volatilities of 5.59% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETIDXFZAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

5.59%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

14.18%

-2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.88%

17.71%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.78%

20.29%

-2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

20.99%

-2.72%

ETIDX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETIDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETIDX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison

ETIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than FZAMX's 5.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETIDX
Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund
2.94%3.58%0.64%0.67%1.98%2.78%1.05%1.99%2.16%1.41%0.00%0.00%
FZAMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z
5.59%10.09%6.93%2.83%5.86%18.58%1.41%3.50%10.72%7.81%5.00%4.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETIDX and FZAMX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZAMX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to ETIDX (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETIDX dropped -34.12% vs FZAMX's -42.32%.

FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETIDX and FZAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer