ETHY.TO vs. PGIC.TO
ETHY.TO (Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while PGIC.TO (Premium Global Income Split Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, ETHY.TO returned -8.68%/yr vs -15.75%/yr for PGIC.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ETHY.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHY.TO achieves a -45.70% return, which is significantly lower than PGIC.TO's 25.23% return.
ETHY.TO
- 1D
- -6.57%
- 1M
- -27.49%
- YTD
- -45.70%
- 6M
- -48.19%
- 1Y
- -39.18%
- 3Y*
- -8.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PGIC.TO
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 25.23%
- 6M
- 27.04%
- 1Y
- 44.28%
- 3Y*
- -15.75%
- 5Y*
- -27.14%
- 10Y*
- -11.90%
ETHY.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHY.TO Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units | -45.70% | -16.16% | 41.02% | 71.08% | -67.53% | -16.93% |
PGIC.TO Premium Global Income Split Corp. | 25.23% | 4.88% | -50.62% | -48.37% | -36.55% | 11.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHY.TO and PGIC.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between ETHY.TO and PGIC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHY.TO vs. PGIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ETHY.TO
PGIC.TO
ETHY.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units (ETHY.TO) and Premium Global Income Split Corp. (PGIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHY.TO | PGIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.51 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 9.42 | -10.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 28.91 | -29.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHY.TO | PGIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 2.98 | -3.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | -0.16 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
ETHY.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHY.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.84%, smaller than the maximum PGIC.TO drawdown of -97.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHY.TO and PGIC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHY.TO | PGIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.84% | -97.73% | +20.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.28% | -4.73% | -60.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.28% | -84.94% | +19.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.37% | -96.28% | +25.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.41% | -71.46% | +20.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.00% | 1.54% | +36.46% |
Volatility
ETHY.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units (ETHY.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.87% compared to Premium Global Income Split Corp. (PGIC.TO) at 6.74%. This indicates that ETHY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHY.TO | PGIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.87% | 6.74% | +6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.96% | 12.02% | +39.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.09% | 14.98% | +54.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.26% | 85.07% | -19.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.26% | 93.27% | -28.01% |
Dividends
ETHY.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Dividend Comparison
ETHY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.13%, more than PGIC.TO's 12.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHY.TO Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units | 43.12% | 19.33% | 21.43% | 10.44% | 26.10% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGIC.TO Premium Global Income Split Corp. | 12.89% | 15.21% | 6.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 4.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHY.TO and PGIC.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ETHY.TO and PGIC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer