ETHW vs. WGMI
ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) and WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ETHW returned -31.71% vs 294.61% for WGMI. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.
Performance
ETHW vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHW achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 84.78% return.
ETHW
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.65%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.65%
- 1Y
- -31.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WGMI
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 40.03%
- YTD
- 84.78%
- 6M
- 55.52%
- 1Y
- 294.61%
- 3Y*
- 86.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHW vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | -39.45% | -11.26% | -3.54% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 84.78% | 72.47% | -8.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHW and WGMI is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between ETHW and WGMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHW vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank
ETHW
WGMI
ETHW vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.42 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 5.83 | -6.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 11.81 | -12.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 3.91 | -4.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.31 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
ETHW vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHW drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHW and WGMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.04% | -85.76% | +21.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.87% | -50.94% | -11.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -62.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.87% | -1.11% | -61.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | -42.90% | +10.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.74% | 25.08% | +12.66% |
Volatility
ETHW vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) is 10.08%, while Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 20.10%. This indicates that ETHW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 20.10% | -10.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.02% | 55.64% | -9.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.33% | 76.03% | -7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 81.53% | -9.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 81.53% | -9.40% |
ETHW vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHW vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHW nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHW and WGMI have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGMI has higher volatility (20.10%) compared to ETHW (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHW dropped -64.04% vs WGMI's -85.76%.
On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 294.61% vs -31.71% for ETHW. On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHW has been the lower-risk option at 10.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 294.61% return vs -31.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.
ETHW and WGMI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Valkyrie. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHW and 0.75% for WGMI.
WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHW and WGMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer