ETHW vs. SBIT
ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHW is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, ETHW returned -31.71% vs 68.00% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. ETHW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
ETHW vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHW achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 37.02% return.
ETHW
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.65%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.65%
- 1Y
- -31.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- 46.58%
- YTD
- 37.02%
- 6M
- 52.37%
- 1Y
- 68.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHW vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | -39.45% | -11.26% | -3.54% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 37.02% | -25.11% | -67.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHW and SBIT is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | -0.81 |
The correlation between ETHW and SBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHW vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
ETHW
SBIT
ETHW vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHW | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | 0.78 | -1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | 1.54 | -1.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.18 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 1.43 | -1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 2.76 | -3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHW | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 0.78 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | -0.46 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
ETHW vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHW drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHW and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHW | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.04% | -91.35% | +27.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.87% | -47.94% | -14.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.87% | -78.26% | +15.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | -68.55% | +35.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.74% | 24.69% | +13.05% |
Volatility
ETHW vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) is 10.08%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.22%. This indicates that ETHW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHW | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 18.22% | -8.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.02% | 68.46% | -22.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.33% | 87.18% | -18.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 97.47% | -25.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 97.47% | -25.34% |
ETHW vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHW vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
ETHW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.42% | 0.52% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHW and SBIT have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to ETHW (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHW dropped -64.04% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 68.00% vs -31.71% for ETHW. On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHW has been the lower-risk option at 10.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 68.00% return vs -31.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for ETHW.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHW and 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHW and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer