ETHV vs. SOLZ
ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and SOLZ (Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHV is passively managed, while SOLZ is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -44.82% vs -60.09% for SOLZ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SOLZ.
Performance
ETHV vs. SOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -36.95% return, which is significantly higher than SOLZ's -39.74% return.
ETHV
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- 6M
- -43.07%
- YTD
- -36.95%
- 1Y
- -44.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLZ
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- 6M
- -46.95%
- YTD
- -39.74%
- 1Y
- -60.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV vs. SOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -36.95% | 45.87% |
SOLZ Solana ETF | -39.74% | -14.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and SOLZ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ETHV and SOLZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. SOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
SOLZ
ETHV vs. SOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Solana ETF (SOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHV | SOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.87 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.80 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -1.16 | +0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. SOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, smaller than the maximum SOLZ drawdown of -75.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and SOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | SOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -75.68% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.88% | -75.68% | +7.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.35% | -70.88% | +9.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.71% | -37.34% | +2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.55% | 52.04% | -8.49% |
Volatility
ETHV vs. SOLZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) is 14.44%, while Solana ETF (SOLZ) has a volatility of 18.34%. This indicates that ETHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | SOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.44% | 18.34% | -3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.28% | 52.67% | -5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.36% | 74.52% | -6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.82% | 76.02% | -4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.82% | 76.02% | -4.20% |
ETHV vs. SOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHV vs. SOLZ - Dividend Comparison
ETHV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOLZ Solana ETF | 3.56% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHV and SOLZ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOLZ has higher volatility (18.34%) compared to ETHV (14.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -67.88% vs SOLZ's -75.68%.
On 1-year performance, ETHV leads with -44.82% vs -60.09% for SOLZ. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 14.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHV has performed better with a -44.82% return vs -60.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SOLZ.
SOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.00% for ETHV.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.95% for SOLZ.
ETHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHV and SOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer