ETHV vs. OBTC
ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ETHV tracks the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate while OBTC tracks the Bitcoin (BTC). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -32.55% vs -30.40% for OBTC. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for OBTC.
Performance
ETHV vs. OBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than OBTC's -27.42% return.
ETHV
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -25.17%
- YTD
- -40.24%
- 6M
- -43.60%
- 1Y
- -32.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBTC
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -22.08%
- YTD
- -27.42%
- 6M
- -26.99%
- 1Y
- -30.40%
- 3Y*
- 55.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV vs. OBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -40.24% | -11.02% | -3.67% |
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | -27.42% | -1.87% | 39.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and OBTC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ETHV and OBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. OBTC — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
OBTC
ETHV vs. OBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHV | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.91 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | -0.67 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -1.21 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHV | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | -0.69 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | -0.22 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. OBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, smaller than the maximum OBTC drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and OBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -94.50% | +30.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.36% | -45.41% | -17.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -83.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.36% | -63.75% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -69.63% | +36.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.95% | 25.22% | +12.73% |
Volatility
ETHV vs. OBTC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) at 9.14%. This indicates that ETHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 9.14% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.31% | 34.13% | +11.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.34% | 44.29% | +24.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.23% | 58.12% | +14.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.23% | 71.54% | +0.69% |
ETHV vs. OBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than OBTC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHV vs. OBTC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHV nor OBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHV and OBTC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHV has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to OBTC (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -64.02% vs OBTC's -94.50%.
On 1-year performance, OBTC leads with -30.40% vs -32.55% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, OBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OBTC has performed better with a -30.40% return vs -32.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for OBTC.
ETHV and OBTC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while OBTC tracks Bitcoin (BTC). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Osprey Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.49% for OBTC.
ETHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHV and OBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer