ETHV vs. CBOO
ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHV is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. ETHV is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
ETHV vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's -0.02% return.
ETHV
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -25.17%
- YTD
- -40.24%
- 6M
- -43.60%
- 1Y
- -32.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -40.24% | -33.80% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -0.02% | -1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and CBOO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
CBOO
ETHV vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHV | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHV | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | -1.17 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -2.34% | -61.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.36% | -1.70% | -61.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -1.61% | -31.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.95% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHV vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.34% | 2.14% | +66.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.23% | 2.14% | +70.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.23% | 2.14% | +70.09% |
ETHV vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHV vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
ETHV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% |
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHV and CBOO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOO.
CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for ETHV.
ETHV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for ETHV and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer