ETHV vs. BTC
ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHV is passively managed, while BTC is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -32.55% vs -39.58% for BTC. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BTC.
Performance
ETHV vs. BTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than BTC's -27.45% return.
ETHV
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -25.17%
- YTD
- -40.24%
- 6M
- -43.60%
- 1Y
- -32.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTC
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -22.20%
- YTD
- -27.45%
- 6M
- -31.41%
- 1Y
- -39.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -40.24% | -11.02% | 2.24% |
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | -27.45% | -7.50% | 44.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and BTC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between ETHV and BTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
BTC
ETHV vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHV | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.86 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | -0.80 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -1.39 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHV | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | -0.91 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | -0.03 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than BTC's maximum drawdown of -49.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and BTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -49.43% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.36% | -49.43% | -13.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.36% | -49.43% | -13.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -16.68% | -16.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.95% | 28.55% | +9.40% |
Volatility
ETHV vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) at 9.06%. This indicates that ETHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 9.06% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.31% | 33.91% | +11.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.34% | 43.72% | +24.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.23% | 48.29% | +23.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.23% | 48.29% | +23.94% |
ETHV vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETHV vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHV nor BTC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHV and BTC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHV has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to BTC (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -64.02% vs BTC's -49.43%.
On 1-year performance, ETHV leads with -32.55% vs -39.58% for BTC. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHV has performed better with a -32.55% return vs -39.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ETHV.
ETHV and BTC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.15% for BTC.
ETHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHV and BTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer