ETHU vs. BTCZ
ETHU (Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ETHU returned -76.14% vs 60.52% for BTCZ. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. ETHU charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
ETHU vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHU achieves a -72.13% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 39.90% return.
ETHU
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- -45.48%
- YTD
- -72.13%
- 6M
- -75.88%
- 1Y
- -76.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.56%
- 1M
- 60.49%
- YTD
- 39.90%
- 6M
- 53.41%
- 1Y
- 60.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHU vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | -72.13% | -64.38% | -20.49% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 39.90% | -29.11% | -76.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHU and BTCZ is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | -0.81 |
The correlation between ETHU and BTCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHU vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
ETHU
BTCZ
ETHU vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHU | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.17 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 1.24 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 2.36 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHU | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 0.69 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.55 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
ETHU vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHU drawdown since its inception was -95.18%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHU and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHU | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.18% | -91.06% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.80% | -49.02% | -42.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.18% | -77.44% | -17.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.45% | -73.73% | +4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.60% | 25.76% | +36.84% |
Volatility
ETHU vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) has a higher volatility of 20.02% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) at 17.24%. This indicates that ETHU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHU | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.02% | 17.24% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.47% | 67.20% | +25.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.43% | 87.54% | +49.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.96% | 97.10% | +45.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.96% | 97.10% | +45.86% |
ETHU vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHU has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHU vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
ETHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | 5.16% | 2.31% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHU and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHU has higher volatility (20.02%) compared to BTCZ (17.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHU dropped -95.18% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.
On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 60.52% vs -76.14% for ETHU. On fees, ETHU is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, BTCZ has been the lower-risk option at 17.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 60.52% return vs -76.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHU is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
ETHU has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHU and 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHU and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer