PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHU vs. BTCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHU vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHU achieves a -72.13% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 39.90% return.


ETHU

1D
-2.88%
1M
-45.48%
YTD
-72.13%
6M
-75.88%
1Y
-76.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCZ

1D
5.56%
1M
60.49%
YTD
39.90%
6M
53.41%
1Y
60.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHU vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHU
Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF
-72.13%-64.38%-20.49%
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
39.90%-29.11%-76.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHU and BTCZ is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

-0.81

The correlation between ETHU and BTCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHU vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHU
ETHU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETHU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHU vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHUBTCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.17

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

1.24

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

2.36

-3.57

ETHU vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHU Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHU and BTCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHUBTCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

0.69

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

-0.55

+0.01

Drawdowns

ETHU vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHU drawdown since its inception was -95.18%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHU and BTCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHUBTCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.18%

-91.06%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.80%

-49.02%

-42.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.18%

-77.44%

-17.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.45%

-73.73%

+4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.60%

25.76%

+36.84%

Volatility

ETHU vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) has a higher volatility of 20.02% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) at 17.24%. This indicates that ETHU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHUBTCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.02%

17.24%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.47%

67.20%

+25.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.43%

87.54%

+49.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

142.96%

97.10%

+45.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

142.96%

97.10%

+45.86%

ETHU vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHU has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHU vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

ETHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%
ETHU
Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF
5.16%2.31%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHU and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHU has higher volatility (20.02%) compared to BTCZ (17.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHU dropped -95.18% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.

On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 60.52% vs -76.14% for ETHU. On fees, ETHU is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, BTCZ has been the lower-risk option at 17.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 60.52% return vs -76.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETHU is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.

ETHU has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.

They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHU and 0.95% for BTCZ.

BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHU and BTCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer