ETHU vs. BFOC
ETHU (Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHU is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHU charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
ETHU vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHU achieves a -71.31% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.39% return.
ETHU
- 1D
- -11.44%
- 1M
- -43.11%
- YTD
- -71.31%
- 6M
- -75.18%
- 1Y
- -75.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHU vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | -71.31% | -60.97% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.39% | -9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHU and BFOC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHU vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
ETHU
BFOC
ETHU vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHU | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHU | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -1.88 | +1.34 |
Drawdowns
ETHU vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHU drawdown since its inception was -95.03%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHU and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHU | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.03% | -18.20% | -76.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.03% | -18.20% | -76.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.40% | -12.52% | -56.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.34% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHU vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHU | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.60% | 12.61% | +124.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.09% | 12.61% | +130.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.09% | 12.61% | +130.48% |
ETHU vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHU has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHU vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
ETHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | 5.01% | 2.31% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHU and BFOC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for ETHU.
ETHU has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
ETHU is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHU and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for ETHU and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer