PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHT vs. SETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHT vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -72.39% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 40.93% return.


ETHT

1D
-11.32%
1M
-43.48%
YTD
-72.39%
6M
-76.21%
1Y
-76.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SETH

1D
5.62%
1M
29.74%
YTD
40.93%
6M
46.51%
1Y
-1.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHT vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHT
ProShares Ultra Ether ETF
-72.39%-64.86%-41.68%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
40.93%-29.41%-9.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHT and SETH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2024

-1.00

The correlation between ETHT and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHT vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHT
ETHT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ETHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SETH
SETH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHT vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHTSETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.05

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.02

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

-0.04

-1.18

ETHT vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHT Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHT and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHTSETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

-0.02

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

-0.45

-0.09

Drawdowns

ETHT vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -94.34%, which is greater than SETH's maximum drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and SETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHTSETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.34%

-80.74%

-13.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.91%

-56.01%

-35.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.34%

-61.29%

-33.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.82%

-54.79%

-10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.48%

35.77%

+26.71%

Volatility

ETHT vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) has a higher volatility of 20.43% compared to ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) at 9.81%. This indicates that ETHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHTSETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.43%

9.81%

+10.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.88%

46.07%

+46.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

136.57%

68.54%

+68.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

142.90%

69.53%

+73.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

142.90%

69.53%

+73.37%

ETHT vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHT vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.20%, more than SETH's 10.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ETHT
ProShares Ultra Ether ETF
17.20%4.57%0.02%0.00%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
10.91%7.01%3.44%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHT and SETH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHT has higher volatility (20.43%) compared to SETH (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHT dropped -94.34% vs SETH's -80.74%.

On 1-year performance, SETH leads with -1.33% vs -76.37% for ETHT. On fees, ETHT is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, SETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a -1.33% return vs -76.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETHT is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.

ETHT has the higher dividend yield at 17.20%, compared with 10.91% for SETH.

ETHT tracks Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%), while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHT and 0.95% for SETH.

SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHT and SETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer