ETHT vs. SETH
ETHT (ProShares Ultra Ether ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares - ETHT tracks the Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%) while SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHT returned -76.37% vs -1.33% for SETH. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. ETHT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.
Performance
ETHT vs. SETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -72.39% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 40.93% return.
ETHT
- 1D
- -11.32%
- 1M
- -43.48%
- YTD
- -72.39%
- 6M
- -76.21%
- 1Y
- -76.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETH
- 1D
- 5.62%
- 1M
- 29.74%
- YTD
- 40.93%
- 6M
- 46.51%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHT vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | -72.39% | -64.86% | -41.68% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 40.93% | -29.41% | -9.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHT and SETH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2024 | -1.00 |
The correlation between ETHT and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHT vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank
ETHT
SETH
ETHT vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHT | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.05 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.02 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | -0.04 | -1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHT | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | -0.02 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.45 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
ETHT vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -94.34%, which is greater than SETH's maximum drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and SETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHT | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.34% | -80.74% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.91% | -56.01% | -35.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.34% | -61.29% | -33.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.82% | -54.79% | -10.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.48% | 35.77% | +26.71% |
Volatility
ETHT vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) has a higher volatility of 20.43% compared to ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) at 9.81%. This indicates that ETHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHT | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.43% | 9.81% | +10.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.88% | 46.07% | +46.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.57% | 68.54% | +68.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.90% | 69.53% | +73.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.90% | 69.53% | +73.37% |
ETHT vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHT vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison
ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.20%, more than SETH's 10.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | 17.20% | 4.57% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 10.91% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHT and SETH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHT has higher volatility (20.43%) compared to SETH (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHT dropped -94.34% vs SETH's -80.74%.
On 1-year performance, SETH leads with -1.33% vs -76.37% for ETHT. On fees, ETHT is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, SETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a -1.33% return vs -76.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHT is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.
ETHT has the higher dividend yield at 17.20%, compared with 10.91% for SETH.
ETHT tracks Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%), while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHT and 0.95% for SETH.
SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHT and SETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer