ETHT vs. CBOO
ETHT (ProShares Ultra Ether ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%), while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. ETHT is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
ETHT vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -77.62% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's 0.10% return.
ETHT
- 1D
- -8.32%
- 1M
- -38.95%
- YTD
- -77.62%
- 6M
- -77.71%
- 1Y
- -74.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHT vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | -77.62% | -67.34% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.10% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHT and CBOO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHT vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
ETHT
CBOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETHT vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHT vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -96.02%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.02% | -2.34% | -93.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.71% | -1.58% | -94.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -1.60% | -66.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.67% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHT vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.89% | 2.07% | +135.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.20% | 2.07% | +141.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.20% | 2.07% | +141.13% |
ETHT vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHT vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.23%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | 21.23% | 4.57% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHT and CBOO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for ETHT.
ETHT has the higher dividend yield at 21.23%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.
ETHT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHT and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for ETHT and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer