ETHT vs. CBOO
ETHT (ProShares Ultra Ether ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%), while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. ETHT is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
ETHT vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -72.39% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's -0.04% return.
ETHT
- 1D
- -11.32%
- 1M
- -43.48%
- YTD
- -72.39%
- 6M
- -76.21%
- 1Y
- -76.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHT vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | -72.39% | -63.39% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -0.04% | -1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHT and CBOO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHT vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
ETHT
CBOO
ETHT vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -1.19 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
ETHT vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -94.34%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.34% | -2.34% | -92.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.34% | -1.72% | -92.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.82% | -1.61% | -63.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.48% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHT vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.57% | 2.14% | +134.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.90% | 2.14% | +140.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.90% | 2.14% | +140.76% |
ETHT vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHT vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.20%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | 17.20% | 4.57% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHT and CBOO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for ETHT.
ETHT has the higher dividend yield at 17.20%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.
ETHT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHT and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for ETHT and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer