ETHT vs. BTCZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ).

ETHT and BTCZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHT is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 6, 2024. BTCZ is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Jul 9, 2024.

Performance

ETHT vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHT vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF	-60.06%	-64.86%	-14.27%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	29.93%	-29.11%	-76.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -60.06% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 29.93% return.

ETHT

• 1D: 7.31%
• 1M: 12.62%
• YTD: -60.06%
• 6M: -83.27%
• 1Y: -39.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCZ

• 1D: -4.04%
• 1M: -11.35%
• YTD: 29.93%
• 6M: 93.66%
• 1Y: -16.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHT vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

BTCZ

T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF

ETHT

ProShares Ultra Ether ETF

Return for Risk

ETHT vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHT

ETHT Risk / Return Rank: 12
ETHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ETHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
ETHT Omega Ratio Rank: 21
ETHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ETHT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 11
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHT vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHT	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	-0.18	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	0.36	+0.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.04	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	-0.20	-0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	-0.29	-0.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHT vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHT Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHT and BTCZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHT	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	-0.18	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.51	-0.59	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between ETHT and BTCZ is -0.81. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

ETHT vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF	11.73%	4.57%	0.02%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%

Drawdowns

ETHT vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and BTCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHT	BTCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.10%	-91.06%	-2.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-90.13%	-68.27%	-21.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.81%	-79.05%	-12.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.26%	-72.74%	+10.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.51%	48.58%	+2.93%

Volatility

ETHT vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) has a higher volatility of 37.83% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) at 26.53%. This indicates that ETHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHT	BTCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.83%	26.53%	+11.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	107.97%	73.35%	+34.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	151.62%	90.77%	+60.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	147.59%	99.68%	+47.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	147.59%	99.68%	+47.91%