ETHSX vs. FIKCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX).
ETHSX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jul 25, 1985. FIKCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
ETHSX vs. FIKCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETHSX vs. FIKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHSX Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund | -5.95% | 10.23% | 3.48% | 5.67% | -9.41% | 22.02% | 13.04% | 25.99% | -6.24% |
FIKCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z | -6.00% | 14.61% | -5.73% | 4.20% | -12.74% | 11.66% | 21.55% | 28.39% | -11.04% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETHSX having a -5.95% return and FIKCX slightly lower at -6.00%.
ETHSX
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- -5.95%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
FIKCX
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -6.00%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 1.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETHSX vs. FIKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKCX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETHSX vs. FIKCX — Risk / Return Rank
ETHSX
FIKCX
ETHSX vs. FIKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHSX | FIKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.01 | 0.47 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.14 | 0.79 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.10 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 0.62 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 1.93 | -1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHSX | FIKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 0.47 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.01 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.24 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHSX and FIKCX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETHSX vs. FIKCX - Dividend Comparison
ETHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, less than FIKCX's 12.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHSX Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund | 7.83% | 7.36% | 4.81% | 2.48% | 4.43% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 5.39% | 5.51% | 2.82% | 12.75% | 9.70% |
FIKCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z | 12.21% | 11.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 0.61% | 4.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ETHSX vs. FIKCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHSX drawdown since its inception was -90.06%, which is greater than FIKCX's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHSX and FIKCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHSX | FIKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.06% | -29.19% | -60.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.26% | -13.35% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.58% | -29.19% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.46% | -11.77% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.13% | -9.26% | -43.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 4.27% | +0.25% |
Volatility
ETHSX vs. FIKCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) is 5.09%, while Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that ETHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETHSX | FIKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 7.08% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 11.61% | -1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.73% | 18.74% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 18.23% | -3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 20.36% | -4.11% |