ETHSX vs. FBDIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) and Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund (FBDIX).
ETHSX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jul 25, 1985. FBDIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Sep 14, 1997.
Performance
ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHSX Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund | -7.98% | 10.23% | 3.48% | 5.67% | -9.41% | 22.02% | 13.04% | 25.99% | 5.87% | 16.24% |
FBDIX Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund | -3.29% | 52.68% | 15.37% | 18.40% | -12.65% | -27.58% | 29.85% | 49.11% | -15.77% | 18.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHSX achieves a -7.98% return, which is significantly lower than FBDIX's -3.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ETHSX has underperformed FBDIX with an annualized return of 7.35%, while FBDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.
ETHSX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -7.98%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- -1.98%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.35%
FBDIX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -3.29%
- 6M
- 18.26%
- 1Y
- 60.44%
- 3Y*
- 25.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FBDIX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETHSX vs. FBDIX — Risk / Return Rank
ETHSX
FBDIX
ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) and Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund (FBDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHSX | FBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 1.99 | -2.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | 2.59 | -2.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 3.04 | -3.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 12.26 | -12.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHSX | FBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 1.99 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.24 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.39 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.40 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHSX and FBDIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Dividend Comparison
ETHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, less than FBDIX's 11.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHSX Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund | 8.00% | 7.36% | 4.81% | 2.48% | 4.43% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 5.39% | 5.51% | 2.82% | 12.75% | 9.70% |
FBDIX Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund | 11.18% | 10.81% | 19.53% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.98% | 14.50% | 18.77% | 3.72% | 2.39% | 4.57% | 8.42% |
Drawdowns
ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHSX drawdown since its inception was -90.06%, which is greater than FBDIX's maximum drawdown of -71.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHSX and FBDIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHSX | FBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.06% | -71.44% | -18.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.26% | -12.39% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.58% | -46.83% | +27.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.43% | -53.67% | +26.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.40% | -7.38% | -5.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.13% | -28.90% | -24.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 3.98% | +0.51% |
Volatility
ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) is 4.47%, while Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund (FBDIX) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that ETHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETHSX | FBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 7.62% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 15.74% | -5.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 25.50% | -7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 25.47% | -10.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 26.35% | -10.11% |