PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHSX vs. FBDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) and Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund (FBDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHSX achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly lower than FBDIX's 1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ETHSX has underperformed FBDIX with an annualized return of 6.65%, while FBDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.


ETHSX

1D
0.41%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-8.58%
6M
-7.33%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
2.72%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
6.65%

FBDIX

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
1.97%
6M
2.55%
1Y
62.78%
3Y*
27.17%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETHSX
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund
-8.58%10.23%3.48%5.67%-9.41%22.02%13.04%25.99%5.87%16.24%
FBDIX
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund
1.97%52.68%15.37%18.40%-12.65%-27.58%29.85%49.11%-15.77%18.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHSX and FBDIX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 1997

0.81

The correlation between ETHSX and FBDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHSX vs. FBDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHSX
ETHSX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FBDIX
FBDIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FBDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FBDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) and Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund (FBDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHSXFBDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.43

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

6.76

-6.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.57

22.71

-22.14

ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the FBDIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHSX and FBDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHSXFBDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

2.69

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.32

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.38

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.40

-0.31

Drawdowns

ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHSX drawdown since its inception was -90.06%, which is greater than FBDIX's maximum drawdown of -71.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHSX and FBDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHSXFBDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.06%

-71.44%

-18.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-9.18%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-24.22%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.58%

-46.83%

+27.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

-53.67%

+26.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.97%

-7.93%

-5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.06%

-28.74%

-15.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

2.73%

+2.39%

Volatility

ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) is 4.37%, while Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund (FBDIX) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that ETHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHSXFBDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

8.57%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

17.73%

-7.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

23.08%

-8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

25.76%

-10.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

26.32%

-10.08%

ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FBDIX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHSX vs. FBDIX - Dividend Comparison

ETHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, less than FBDIX's 10.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETHSX
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund
8.06%7.36%4.81%2.48%4.43%8.25%7.33%5.39%5.51%2.82%12.75%9.70%
FBDIX
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund
10.60%10.81%19.53%0.00%0.13%0.98%14.50%18.77%3.72%2.39%4.57%8.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHSX and FBDIX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBDIX has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to ETHSX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHSX dropped -90.06% vs FBDIX's -71.44%.

FBDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHSX and FBDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer