PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHO vs. TAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ETHO vs. TAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETHO vs. TAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHO
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF
2.47%10.23%8.17%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
14.56%48.31%-24.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than TAN's 14.56% return.


ETHO

1D
1.26%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
2.47%
6M
5.50%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAN

1D
1.01%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
14.56%
6M
24.82%
1Y
82.69%
3Y*
-10.00%
5Y*
-9.00%
10Y*
10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETHO vs. TAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TAN's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ETHO vs. TAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHO
ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

TAN
TAN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHO vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHOTANDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

2.10

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

2.68

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

5.21

-3.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.81

13.78

-6.97

ETHO vs. TAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHO Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the TAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHO and TAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHOTANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.10

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

-0.15

+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between ETHO and TAN is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ETHO vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison

ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while TAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETHO
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF
0.84%0.86%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.30%0.69%1.77%5.04%1.60%

Drawdowns

ETHO vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and TAN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHOTANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.50%

-95.29%

+69.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

-16.25%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-74.16%

+69.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-78.57%

+73.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

6.15%

-2.81%

Volatility

ETHO vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) is 7.58%, while Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a volatility of 10.07%. This indicates that ETHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETHOTANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

10.07%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

26.24%

-12.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.46%

39.51%

-17.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

39.82%

-20.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

37.78%

-18.17%