ETHO vs. SRHQ
ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - ETHO tracks the Etho Climate Leadership Index while SRHQ tracks the SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHO returned 34.51% vs 21.95% for SRHQ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.
Performance
ETHO vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than SRHQ's 11.72% return.
ETHO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRHQ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHO vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 17.28% | 10.23% | 8.17% |
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF | 11.72% | 7.34% | 15.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHO and SRHQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ETHO and SRHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
ETHO vs. SRHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ETHO
SRHQ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ETHO
SRHQ
Industrials
ETHO
SRHQ
Financial Services
ETHO
SRHQ
Healthcare
ETHO
SRHQ
Consumer Cyclical
ETHO
SRHQ
Real Estate
ETHO
SRHQ
Consumer Defensive
ETHO
SRHQ
Communication Services
ETHO
SRHQ
Basic Materials
ETHO
SRHQ
Utilities
ETHO
SRHQ
Energy
ETHO
SRHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHO vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank
ETHO
SRHQ
ETHO vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHO | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 1.50 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.79 | 2.18 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 3.50 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 11.97 | +2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHO | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.50 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.06 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
ETHO vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, which is greater than SRHQ's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and SRHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHO | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.50% | -18.50% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -6.31% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -1.72% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -3.08% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 1.84% | +0.54% |
Volatility
ETHO vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) at 3.48%. This indicates that ETHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHO | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 3.48% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 10.71% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 14.75% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 16.03% | +3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 16.03% | +3.37% |
ETHO vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHO vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison
ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than SRHQ's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 0.73% | 0.86% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.84% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHO and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHO has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to SRHQ (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs SRHQ's -18.50%.
On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 34.51% vs 21.95% for SRHQ. On fees, SRHQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SRHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 34.51% return vs 21.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRHQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ETHO.
ETHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.71% for SRHQ.
ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index, while SRHQ tracks SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.35% for SRHQ.
ETHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHO and SRHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer