ETHO vs. SRHQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Etho Climate Leadership Index, while SRHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHO returned 37.16% vs 31.30% for SRHQ. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.

Performance

ETHO vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETHO having a 21.44% return and SRHQ slightly lower at 20.78%.

ETHO

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.30%
• 6M: 16.62%
• YTD: 21.44%
• 1Y: 37.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.23%

SRHQ

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 1.86%
• 6M: 18.75%
• YTD: 20.78%
• 1Y: 31.30%
• 3Y*: 17.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	$257.99K	$228.52K	$294.89K
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	$113.47K	$63.13K	$30.03K

ETHO vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	21.44%	10.23%	11.21%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	20.78%	7.34%	16.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHO and SRHQ is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2024	0.86

The correlation between ETHO and SRHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

ETHO vs. SRHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ETHO	SRHQ
Technology	25.9%	21.9%
Industrials	15.2%	20.4%
Financial Services	13.8%	10.2%
Healthcare	13.1%	21.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	11.3%
Real Estate	6.0%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	5.2%
Basic Materials	4.6%	2.7%
Communication Services	3.6%	2.1%
Utilities	2.4%	1.2%
Energy	0.3%	1.2%

Return for Risk

ETHO vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETHO

ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 86
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SRHQ

SRHQ Risk / Return Rank: 87
SRHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SRHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SRHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SRHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SRHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETHO vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHO	SRHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.97	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.80	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	4.64	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.85	16.85	-1.99

ETHO vs. SRHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHO Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SRHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHO and SRHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHO vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, which is greater than SRHQ's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and SRHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHO	SRHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.50%	-18.50%	-7.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.25%	-6.31%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-1.47%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.30%	-2.98%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	1.74%	+0.64%

Volatility

ETHO vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) is 3.88%, while SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that ETHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHO	SRHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	4.37%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.07%	11.10%	+1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.74%	14.90%	+2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.25%	15.96%	+3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.25%	15.96%	+3.29%

ETHO vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHO vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison

ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than SRHQ's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	0.70%	0.86%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	0.69%	0.76%	0.66%	0.84%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHO and SRHQ in my portfolio?

ETHO and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHO or SRHQ?

SRHQ has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to ETHO (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs SRHQ's -18.50%.

Which ETF is better, ETHO or SRHQ?

On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 37.16% vs 31.30% for SRHQ. On fees, SRHQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHO or SRHQ?

Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 37.16% return vs 31.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHO or SRHQ?

SRHQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ETHO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHO or SRHQ?

ETHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.69% for SRHQ.

What is the main difference between ETHO and SRHQ?

ETHO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SRHQ is Quality Factor. ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index, while SRHQ tracks SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.35% for SRHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.