ETHO vs. SIXL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. ETHO is passively managed, while SIXL is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHO returned 37.16% vs 14.10% for SIXL. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SIXL.

Performance

ETHO vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 21.44% return, which is significantly higher than SIXL's 11.76% return.

ETHO

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.30%
• 6M: 16.62%
• YTD: 21.44%
• 1Y: 37.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.23%

SIXL

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 6.85%
• YTD: 11.76%
• 1Y: 14.10%
• 3Y*: 9.10%
• 5Y*: 4.75%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	$257.99K	$228.52K	$294.89K
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	$85.49K	$51.42K	$104.59K

ETHO vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	21.44%	10.23%	11.21%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	11.76%	-0.61%	13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHO and SIXL is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2024	0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between ETHO and SIXL has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ETHO vs. SIXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ETHO	SIXL
Technology	25.9%	2.4%
Industrials	15.2%	6.3%
Financial Services	13.8%	15.7%
Healthcare	13.1%	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	6.5%
Real Estate	6.0%	13.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	16.4%
Basic Materials	4.6%	2.3%
Communication Services	3.6%	2.5%
Utilities	2.4%	17.0%
Energy	0.3%	2.0%

Return for Risk

ETHO vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETHO

ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 86
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SIXL

SIXL Risk / Return Rank: 55
SIXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SIXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SIXL Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SIXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SIXL Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETHO vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHO	SIXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.33	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.02	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.24	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	2.12	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.85	5.72	+9.13

ETHO vs. SIXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHO Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the SIXL Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHO and SIXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHO vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, which is greater than SIXL's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and SIXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHO	SIXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.50%	-16.08%	-9.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.25%	-6.52%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-1.97%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.30%	-4.49%	+0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	2.41%	-0.03%

Volatility

ETHO vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) is 3.88%, while ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that ETHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHO	SIXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	4.24%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.07%	7.92%	+5.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.74%	10.43%	+7.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.25%	12.31%	+6.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.25%	12.60%	+6.65%

ETHO vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHO vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison

ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than SIXL's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	0.70%	0.86%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	2.19%	2.31%	1.28%	1.48%	1.45%	0.67%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHO and SIXL in my portfolio?

ETHO and SIXL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHO or SIXL?

SIXL has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to ETHO (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs SIXL's -16.08%.

Which ETF is better, ETHO or SIXL?

On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 37.16% vs 14.10% for SIXL. On fees, ETHO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHO or SIXL?

Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 37.16% return vs 14.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHO or SIXL?

ETHO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SIXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHO or SIXL?

SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.70% for ETHO.

What is the main difference between ETHO and SIXL?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.47% for SIXL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.