ETHH.TO vs. KILO-B.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO).

ETHH.TO and KILO-B.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHH.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 14, 2021. KILO-B.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 15, 2018.

Performance

ETHH.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHH.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ETHH.TO Purpose Ether ETF	-28.98%	-14.37%	38.87%	91.16%	-69.16%	51.50%
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged	11.54%	56.51%	37.76%	10.43%	6.38%	2.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHH.TO achieves a -28.98% return, which is significantly lower than KILO-B.TO's 11.54% return.

ETHH.TO

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: 4.55%
• YTD: -28.98%
• 6M: -51.68%
• 1Y: 8.21%
• 3Y*: 1.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KILO-B.TO

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -9.47%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 22.50%
• 1Y: 47.79%
• 3Y*: 35.04%
• 5Y*: 24.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHH.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHH.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than KILO-B.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.

ETHH.TO

Purpose Ether ETF

KILO-B.TO

Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged

Return for Risk

ETHH.TO vs. KILO-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHH.TO

ETHH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 17
ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
ETHH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ETHH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ETHH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ETHH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 14

KILO-B.TO

KILO-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
KILO-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
KILO-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHH.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHH.TO	KILO-B.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	1.85	-1.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	2.31	-1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.35	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	2.69	-2.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.41	9.43	-9.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHH.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHH.TO and KILO-B.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHH.TO	KILO-B.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11	1.85	-1.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	1.31	-1.39

Correlation

The correlation between ETHH.TO and KILO-B.TO is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

ETHH.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHH.TO nor KILO-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ETHH.TO Purpose Ether ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%

Drawdowns

ETHH.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHH.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.46%, which is greater than KILO-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHH.TO and KILO-B.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHH.TO	KILO-B.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.46%	-22.54%	-56.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.39%	-17.41%	-44.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.13%	-9.47%	-52.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.65%	-7.59%	-41.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.13%	4.96%	+26.17%

Volatility

ETHH.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.87% compared to Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) at 10.32%. This indicates that ETHH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KILO-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHH.TO	KILO-B.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.87%	10.32%	+8.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.14%	23.01%	+30.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.53%	26.03%	+48.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.88%	16.61%	+57.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.88%	17.98%	+55.90%