ETHH.TO vs. BCCL.NEO
ETHH.TO (Purpose Ether ETF) and BCCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ETHH.TO returned -48.97% vs -45.87% for BCCL.NEO. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ETHH.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for BCCL.NEO.
Performance
ETHH.TO vs. BCCL.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHH.TO achieves a -38.87% return, which is significantly lower than BCCL.NEO's -28.69% return.
ETHH.TO
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- 6M
- -21.54%
- YTD
- -38.87%
- 1Y
- -48.97%
- 3Y*
- -3.29%
- 5Y*
- -8.33%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.09%
BCCL.NEO
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- -45.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$76.07K | CA$135.25K | CA$227.19K | |
ETHH.TO Purpose Ether ETF | CA$119.99K | CA$198.31K | CA$386.38K |
ETHH.TO vs. BCCL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHH.TO Purpose Ether ETF | -38.87% | 58.10% |
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -28.69% | -6.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHH.TO and BCCL.NEO is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between ETHH.TO and BCCL.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHH.TO vs. BCCL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
ETHH.TO
BCCL.NEO
ETHH.TO vs. BCCL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHH.TO | BCCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.82 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.88 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -1.33 | +0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHH.TO vs. BCCL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHH.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.46%, which is greater than BCCL.NEO's maximum drawdown of -55.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHH.TO and BCCL.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHH.TO | BCCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.46% | -55.27% | -24.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.96% | -55.27% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.40% | -51.47% | -15.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.64% | -26.18% | -23.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.41% | 36.35% | +10.06% |
Volatility
ETHH.TO vs. BCCL.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) at 8.77%. This indicates that ETHH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCCL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHH.TO | BCCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.69% | 8.77% | +2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.66% | 33.62% | +12.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.55% | 46.76% | +19.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.42% | 44.50% | +24.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.59% | 44.50% | +28.09% |
ETHH.TO vs. BCCL.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHH.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BCCL.NEO's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHH.TO vs. BCCL.NEO - Dividend Comparison
ETHH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 43.98% | 16.02% |
ETHH.TO Purpose Ether ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHH.TO and BCCL.NEO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHH.TO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHH.TO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for BCCL.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Purpose and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for ETHH.TO and 1.78% for BCCL.NEO.
Find the right allocation for ETHH.TO and BCCL.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer