ETHE vs. BFOC
ETHE (Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHE is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Ether Price Index , while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. ETHE is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHE charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
ETHE vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHE achieves a -39.63% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.39% return.
ETHE
- 1D
- -5.64%
- 1M
- -23.64%
- YTD
- -39.63%
- 6M
- -42.89%
- 1Y
- -32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- -11.60%
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHE vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF | -39.63% | -31.70% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.39% | -9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHE and BFOC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHE vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
ETHE
BFOC
ETHE vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | -1.88 | +1.94 |
Drawdowns
ETHE vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHE drawdown since its inception was -96.26%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.26% | -18.20% | -78.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.17% | -18.20% | -58.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.23% | -12.52% | -59.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.98% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHE vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.31% | 12.61% | +55.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.26% | 12.61% | +69.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.84% | 12.61% | +179.23% |
ETHE vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHE vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
ETHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% |
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHE and BFOC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETHE.
ETHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
ETHE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETHE and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for ETHE and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer