ETHE vs. BCDF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ETHE (Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHE is passively managed, while BCDF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ETHE returned 19.37%/yr vs 14.97%/yr for BCDF. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHE charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.

Performance

ETHE vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHE achieves a -39.63% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 3.23% return.

ETHE

• 1D: -5.64%
• 1M: -23.64%
• YTD: -39.63%
• 6M: -42.89%
• 1Y: -32.48%
• 3Y*: 19.37%
• 5Y*: -11.60%
• 10Y*: —

BCDF

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -4.70%
• YTD: 3.23%
• 6M: 4.02%
• 1Y: 6.26%
• 3Y*: 14.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHE vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF	-39.63%	-13.03%	44.14%	308.40%	-60.86%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	3.23%	11.63%	14.87%	24.99%	-22.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHE and BCDF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022	0.46

Return for Risk

ETHE vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHE

ETHE Risk / Return Rank: 5
ETHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ETHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ETHE Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ETHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ETHE Martin Ratio Rank: 5

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 16
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHE vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHE	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	0.43	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	0.69	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.08	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	0.82	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	1.85	-2.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHE vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHE Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHE and BCDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHE	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	0.43	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.39	-0.33

Drawdowns

ETHE vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHE drawdown since its inception was -96.26%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE and BCDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHE	BCDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.26%	-27.70%	-68.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.16%	-7.63%	-55.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.12%	-13.46%	-52.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.17%	-7.63%	-69.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.23%	-9.83%	-62.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.98%	3.39%	+34.59%

Volatility

ETHE vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 5.17%. This indicates that ETHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHE	BCDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.87%	5.17%	+4.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.00%	11.03%	+34.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.31%	14.76%	+53.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.26%	16.94%	+65.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	191.84%	16.94%	+174.90%

ETHE vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHE vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

ETHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than BCDF's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.45%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF	1.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHE and BCDF in my portfolio?

ETHE and BCDF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHE or BCDF?

ETHE has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to BCDF (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHE dropped -96.26% vs BCDF's -27.70%.

Which ETF is better, ETHE or BCDF?

On 3-year performance, ETHE leads with 19.37% vs 14.97% for BCDF. On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BCDF has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHE or BCDF?

Over the 3-year period, ETHE has performed better with a 19.37% return vs 14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHE or BCDF?

BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETHE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHE or BCDF?

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.35% for ETHE.

What is the main difference between ETHE and BCDF?

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETHE and 0.85% for BCDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.