ETHE.SW vs. FFUT
ETHE.SW (CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHE.SW is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHE.SW charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.
Performance
ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ETHE.SW is traded in CHF, while FFUT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FFUT values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHE.SW achieves a -38.22% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 12.42% return.
ETHE.SW
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- -20.52%
- YTD
- -38.22%
- 6M
- -40.57%
- 1Y
- -31.93%
- 3Y*
- -4.42%
- 5Y*
- -9.17%
- 10Y*
- —
FFUT
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHE.SW CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) | -38.22% | 11.55% |
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 12.42% | 4.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHE.SW and FFUT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHE.SW vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank
ETHE.SW
FFUT
ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHE.SW | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHE.SW | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 1.23 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHE.SW drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -5.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE.SW and FFUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHE.SW | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.57% | -5.73% | -71.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.59% | -0.30% | -66.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.25% | -1.85% | -41.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.01% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHE.SW | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.96% | 14.70% | +64.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.47% | 14.70% | +69.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.11% | 14.70% | +72.41% |
ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHE.SW has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison
ETHE.SW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETHE.SW CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 1.85% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHE.SW and FFUT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHE.SW is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHE.SW is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.
ETHE.SW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for ETHE.SW and 0.80% for FFUT.
Find the right allocation for ETHE.SW and FFUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer