PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHE.SW vs. FFUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ETHE.SW is traded in CHF, while FFUT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FFUT values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHE.SW achieves a -38.22% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 12.42% return.


ETHE.SW

1D
-3.24%
1M
-20.52%
YTD
-38.22%
6M
-40.57%
1Y
-31.93%
3Y*
-4.42%
5Y*
-9.17%
10Y*

FFUT

1D
-0.30%
1M
2.07%
YTD
12.42%
6M
13.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ETHE.SW
CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)
-38.22%11.55%
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
12.42%4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHE.SW and FFUT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHE.SW vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHE.SW
ETHE.SW Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHE.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHE.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHE.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHE.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHE.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FFUT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHE.SWFFUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHE.SWFFUTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

1.23

-1.23

Drawdowns

ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHE.SW drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -5.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE.SW and FFUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHE.SWFFUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.57%

-5.73%

-71.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.59%

-0.30%

-66.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.25%

-1.85%

-41.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.01%

Volatility

ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHE.SWFFUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.96%

14.70%

+64.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.47%

14.70%

+69.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.11%

14.70%

+72.41%

ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHE.SW has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHE.SW vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

ETHE.SW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.


PositionTTM2025
ETHE.SW
CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)
0.00%0.00%
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
1.85%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHE.SW and FFUT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETHE.SW is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETHE.SW is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

ETHE.SW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for ETHE.SW and 0.80% for FFUT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHE.SW and FFUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer