ETHD vs. CBOL
ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. ETHD charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.
Performance
ETHD vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHD achieves a 63.80% return, which is significantly higher than CBOL's -2.03% return.
ETHD
- 1D
- 11.25%
- 1M
- 66.19%
- YTD
- 63.80%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- -42.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOL
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- -2.03%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 63.80% | 39.65% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | -2.03% | -2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHD and CBOL is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | -0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHD vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank
ETHD
CBOL
ETHD vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHD | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHD | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | -1.80 | +1.45 |
Drawdowns
ETHD vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHD drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -4.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHD and CBOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHD | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.59% | -4.91% | -90.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.20% | -4.64% | -82.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.01% | -3.21% | -62.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.00% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHD vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHD | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.23% | 3.88% | +132.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.19% | 3.88% | +138.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.19% | 3.88% | +138.31% |
ETHD vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHD has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHD vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison
ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than CBOL's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.83% | 1.79% | 0.00% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 10.68% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHD and CBOL have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 1.83% for CBOL.
ETHD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for ETHD and 0.79% for CBOL.
Find the right allocation for ETHD and CBOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer