ETHD vs. CBOL
ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.88, they often move in opposite directions. ETHD charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.
Performance
ETHD vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHD achieves a 75.32% return, which is significantly higher than CBOL's -2.17% return.
ETHD
- 1D
- 8.45%
- 1M
- 38.06%
- YTD
- 75.32%
- 6M
- 75.17%
- 1Y
- -49.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOL
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- -2.17%
- 6M
- -2.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 75.32% | 48.88% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | -2.17% | -2.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHD and CBOL is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | -0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHD vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank
ETHD
CBOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETHD vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHD | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHD vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHD drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -5.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHD and CBOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHD | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.59% | -5.05% | -90.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.30% | -4.78% | -81.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.40% | -3.30% | -63.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.92% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHD vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHD | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.55% | 3.83% | +133.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.54% | 3.83% | +138.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.54% | 3.83% | +138.71% |
ETHD vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHD has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHD vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison
ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.98%, more than CBOL's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.83% | 1.79% | 0.00% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 9.98% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHD and CBOL have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 9.98%, compared with 1.83% for CBOL.
ETHD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for ETHD and 0.79% for CBOL.
Find the right allocation for ETHD and CBOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer