ETHA vs. SOLZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) and SOLZ (Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHA is passively managed, while SOLZ is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHA returned -31.79% vs -59.43% for SOLZ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SOLZ.

Performance

ETHA vs. SOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and Solana ETF (SOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHA achieves a -39.46% return, which is significantly higher than SOLZ's -42.90% return.

ETHA

• 1D: -5.56%
• 1M: -23.58%
• YTD: -39.46%
• 6M: -42.75%
• 1Y: -31.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOLZ

• 1D: -4.69%
• 1M: -15.18%
• YTD: -42.90%
• 6M: -50.08%
• 1Y: -59.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHA vs. SOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	-39.46%	50.23%
SOLZ Solana ETF	-42.90%	-12.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHA and SOLZ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	0.87

The correlation between ETHA and SOLZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETHA vs. SOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHA

ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 5
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 5

SOLZ

SOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
SOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHA vs. SOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and Solana ETF (SOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHA	SOLZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	-0.81	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	-1.18	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.87	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	-0.82	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	-1.29	+0.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHA vs. SOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHA Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is higher than the SOLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHA and SOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHA	SOLZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	-0.81	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.41	-0.58	+0.17

Drawdowns

ETHA vs. SOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, smaller than the maximum SOLZ drawdown of -72.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and SOLZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHA	SOLZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.02%	-72.41%	+8.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.89%	-72.41%	+9.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.89%	-72.41%	+9.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.65%	-34.11%	+1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.73%	46.03%	-8.30%

Volatility

ETHA vs. SOLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) is 10.15%, while Solana ETF (SOLZ) has a volatility of 16.15%. This indicates that ETHA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHA	SOLZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.15%	16.15%	-6.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.25%	50.76%	-4.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.61%	74.02%	-5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.53%	76.07%	-3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.53%	76.07%	-3.54%

ETHA vs. SOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHA vs. SOLZ - Dividend Comparison

ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.

Position	TTM	2025
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SOLZ Solana ETF	3.92%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHA and SOLZ in my portfolio?

ETHA and SOLZ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHA or SOLZ?

SOLZ has higher volatility (16.15%) compared to ETHA (10.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHA dropped -64.02% vs SOLZ's -72.41%.

Which ETF is better, ETHA or SOLZ?

On 1-year performance, ETHA leads with -31.79% vs -59.43% for SOLZ. On fees, ETHA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ETHA has been the lower-risk option at 10.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHA or SOLZ?

Over the 1-year period, ETHA has performed better with a -31.79% return vs -59.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHA or SOLZ?

ETHA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SOLZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHA or SOLZ?

SOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.00% for ETHA.

What is the main difference between ETHA and SOLZ?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHA and 0.95% for SOLZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.