ETHA vs. ETHV
ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) and ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ETHA tracks the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant while ETHV tracks the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHA returned -31.79% vs -31.70% for ETHV. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ETHA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHV.
Performance
ETHA vs. ETHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ETHA having a -39.46% return and ETHV slightly higher at -39.43%.
ETHA
- 1D
- -5.56%
- 1M
- -23.58%
- YTD
- -39.46%
- 6M
- -42.75%
- 1Y
- -31.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV
- 1D
- -5.70%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 6M
- -42.69%
- 1Y
- -31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHA vs. ETHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | -39.46% | -11.31% | -3.62% |
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -39.43% | -11.02% | -3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHA and ETHV is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between ETHA and ETHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHA vs. ETHV — Risk / Return Rank
ETHA
ETHV
ETHA vs. ETHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHA | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.51 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -0.84 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHA | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | -0.47 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | -0.41 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
ETHA vs. ETHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHV drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and ETHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHA | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -64.02% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.89% | -62.87% | -0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.89% | -62.87% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | -32.64% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.73% | 37.74% | -0.01% |
Volatility
ETHA vs. ETHV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) have volatilities of 10.15% and 9.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHA | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.15% | 9.92% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.25% | 46.03% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.61% | 68.43% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.53% | 72.30% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.53% | 72.30% | +0.23% |
ETHA vs. ETHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETHA vs. ETHV - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHA nor ETHV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ETHA and ETHV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ETHA has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to ETHV (9.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHA dropped -64.02% vs ETHV's -64.02%.
On 1-year performance, ETHV leads with -31.70% vs -31.79% for ETHA. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 9.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHV has performed better with a -31.70% return vs -31.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ETHA.
ETHA and ETHV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ETHA tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHA and 0.20% for ETHV.
ETHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHA and ETHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer