ETHA vs. CCCX.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO).

ETHA and CCCX.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate-New York Variant. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. CCCX.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Aug 22, 2025.

Performance

ETHA vs. CCCX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHA vs. CCCX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	-29.42%	-33.18%
CCCX.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF	-30.75%	-25.14%

Different Trading Currencies

ETHA is traded in USD, while CCCX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CCCX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETHA having a -29.42% return and CCCX.TO slightly lower at -30.75%.

ETHA

• 1D: 3.67%
• 1M: 9.02%
• YTD: -29.42%
• 6M: -49.76%
• 1Y: 14.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCCX.TO

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -3.38%
• YTD: -30.75%
• 6M: -46.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHA vs. CCCX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CCCX.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

CCCX.TO

CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF

ETHA

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF

Return for Risk

ETHA vs. CCCX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHA

ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 21
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHA vs. CCCX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHA	CCCX.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.39	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHA	CCCX.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.35	-1.17	+0.82

Correlation

The correlation between ETHA and CCCX.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ETHA vs. CCCX.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHA nor CCCX.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ETHA vs. CCCX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than CCCX.TO's maximum drawdown of -53.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and CCCX.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHA	CCCX.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.02%	-54.70%	-9.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.74%	-52.07%	-4.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.40%	-28.62%	-1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETHA	CCCX.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.12%	58.15%	+17.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.10%	58.15%	+16.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.10%	58.15%	+16.95%