ETHA.DE vs. CSSC.DE
ETHA.DE (21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP) and CSSC.DE (CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ETHA.DE returned -4.07%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for CSSC.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHA.DE charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for CSSC.DE.
Performance
ETHA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHA.DE achieves a -39.59% return, which is significantly lower than CSSC.DE's -31.24% return.
ETHA.DE
- 1D
- -3.89%
- 1M
- -23.90%
- YTD
- -39.59%
- 6M
- -41.48%
- 1Y
- -32.56%
- 3Y*
- -4.07%
- 5Y*
- -6.03%
- 10Y*
- —
CSSC.DE
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- -16.01%
- YTD
- -31.24%
- 6M
- -35.65%
- 1Y
- -38.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHA.DE 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP | -39.59% | -22.34% | 52.23% | 34.46% |
CSSC.DE CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP | -31.24% | -35.55% | 50.17% | 86.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHA.DE and CSSC.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ETHA.DE and CSSC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHA.DE vs. CSSC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETHA.DE
CSSC.DE
ETHA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHA.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.90 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.65 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | -1.04 | +0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHA.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | -0.74 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.12 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
ETHA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.82%, which is greater than CSSC.DE's maximum drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA.DE and CSSC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHA.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.82% | -65.21% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.72% | -61.70% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.71% | -65.21% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.41% | -64.95% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.74% | -28.09% | -15.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.35% | 38.93% | -2.58% |
Volatility
ETHA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Volatility Comparison
21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) have volatilities of 10.14% and 10.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHA.DE | CSSC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | 10.56% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.04% | 36.99% | +5.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.62% | 54.25% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.07% | 59.64% | +7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.50% | 59.64% | +9.86% |
ETHA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHA.DE has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSC.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHA.DE nor CSSC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ETHA.DE and CSSC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CSSC.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSC.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for ETHA.DE.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for ETHA.DE and 0.00% for CSSC.DE.
Find the right allocation for ETHA.DE and CSSC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer