ETHA.DE vs. CIWP.DE
ETHA.DE (21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP) and CIWP.DE (CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ETHA.DE returned -4.07%/yr vs -21.43%/yr for CIWP.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHA.DE charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIWP.DE.
Performance
ETHA.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHA.DE achieves a -39.59% return, which is significantly higher than CIWP.DE's -54.69% return.
ETHA.DE
- 1D
- -3.89%
- 1M
- -23.90%
- YTD
- -39.59%
- 6M
- -41.48%
- 1Y
- -32.56%
- 3Y*
- -4.07%
- 5Y*
- -6.03%
- 10Y*
- —
CIWP.DE
- 1D
- -7.37%
- 1M
- -21.15%
- YTD
- -54.69%
- 6M
- -52.29%
- 1Y
- -59.04%
- 3Y*
- -21.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHA.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHA.DE 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP | -39.59% | -22.34% | 52.23% | 90.31% | -58.55% |
CIWP.DE CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP | -54.69% | -60.70% | 82.28% | 43.15% | -29.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHA.DE and CIWP.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ETHA.DE and CIWP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHA.DE vs. CIWP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETHA.DE
CIWP.DE
ETHA.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE) and CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHA.DE | CIWP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.91 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.77 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | -1.16 | +0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHA.DE | CIWP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | -0.65 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -0.25 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
ETHA.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.82%, smaller than the maximum CIWP.DE drawdown of -86.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA.DE and CIWP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHA.DE | CIWP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.82% | -86.95% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.72% | -77.55% | +15.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.71% | -86.95% | +22.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.41% | -86.95% | +22.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.74% | -48.11% | +4.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.35% | 51.24% | -14.89% |
Volatility
ETHA.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE) is 10.14%, while CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE) has a volatility of 22.07%. This indicates that ETHA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIWP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHA.DE | CIWP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | 22.07% | -11.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.04% | 55.47% | -13.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.62% | 91.32% | -31.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.07% | 94.63% | -27.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.50% | 94.63% | -25.13% |
ETHA.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHA.DE has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CIWP.DE's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHA.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHA.DE nor CIWP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHA.DE and CIWP.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHA.DE is cheaper at 1.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHA.DE is cheaper with a 1.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIWP.DE.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for ETHA.DE and 1.50% for CIWP.DE.
Find the right allocation for ETHA.DE and CIWP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer