CIWP.DE vs. CSSC.DE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE).

CIWP.DE and CSSC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIWP.DE is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on May 4, 2022. CSSC.DE is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Mar 27, 2023.

Performance

CIWP.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CIWP.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CIWP.DE CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP	-39.91%	-60.70%	82.28%	31.13%
CSSC.DE CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP	-24.98%	-35.55%	50.17%	86.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIWP.DE achieves a -39.91% return, which is significantly lower than CSSC.DE's -24.98% return.

CIWP.DE

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -4.03%
• YTD: -39.91%
• 6M: -52.32%
• 1Y: -45.88%
• 3Y*: -19.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSSC.DE

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: 4.66%
• YTD: -24.98%
• 6M: -51.86%
• 1Y: -22.12%
• 3Y*: 7.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIWP.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIWP.DE has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSC.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.

CIWP.DE

CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP

CSSC.DE

CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP

Return for Risk

CIWP.DE vs. CSSC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIWP.DE

CIWP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4
CIWP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CIWP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CIWP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CIWP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CIWP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CSSC.DE

CSSC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6
CSSC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CSSC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CSSC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CSSC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CSSC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIWP.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIWP.DE	CSSC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	-0.37	-0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.28	-0.17	-0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.98	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	-0.39	-0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	-0.76	-0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIWP.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIWP.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the CSSC.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIWP.DE and CSSC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIWP.DE	CSSC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	-0.37	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.20	0.17	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between CIWP.DE and CSSC.DE is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CIWP.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIWP.DE nor CSSC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CIWP.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIWP.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.45%, which is greater than CSSC.DE's maximum drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIWP.DE and CSSC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIWP.DE	CSSC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.45%	-65.21%	-19.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-73.24%	-61.70%	-11.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.70%	-61.76%	-20.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.52%	-26.26%	-20.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.78%	31.43%	+10.35%

Volatility

CIWP.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.96% compared to CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) at 14.27%. This indicates that CIWP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSSC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIWP.DE	CSSC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.96%	14.27%	+1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.67%	41.39%	+25.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.29%	59.72%	+35.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.60%	60.74%	+34.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.60%	60.74%	+34.86%