PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETGLX vs. KMKNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETGLX vs. KMKNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eventide Gilead Fund (ETGLX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETGLX achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than KMKNX's 10.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ETGLX has underperformed KMKNX with an annualized return of 13.62%, while KMKNX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.45% annualized return.


ETGLX

1D
-0.03%
1M
9.23%
YTD
13.77%
6M
12.73%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
13.62%

KMKNX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-8.85%
YTD
10.78%
6M
7.36%
1Y
-0.78%
3Y*
32.82%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
19.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETGLX vs. KMKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETGLX
Eventide Gilead Fund
13.77%23.50%-0.23%22.52%-34.17%11.22%55.13%33.84%-2.56%32.85%
KMKNX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class
10.78%-3.09%84.05%-7.34%14.98%28.03%19.56%22.76%-10.68%47.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ETGLX and KMKNX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2008

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between ETGLX and KMKNX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETGLX vs. KMKNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETGLX
ETGLX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ETGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ETGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

KMKNX
KMKNX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KMKNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMKNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMKNX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
KMKNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMKNX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETGLX vs. KMKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Gilead Fund (ETGLX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETGLXKMKNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

0.01

+2.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

0.17

+2.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.02

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

0.01

+2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.91

0.03

+9.88

ETGLX vs. KMKNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the KMKNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETGLX and KMKNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETGLXKMKNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

0.01

+2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.58

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.83

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Drawdowns

ETGLX vs. KMKNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETGLX drawdown since its inception was -41.41%, smaller than the maximum KMKNX drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETGLX and KMKNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETGLXKMKNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.41%

-65.47%

+24.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-16.99%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-28.27%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.41%

-31.47%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.41%

-31.47%

-9.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-18.76%

+18.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-15.28%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

6.89%

-3.27%

Volatility

ETGLX vs. KMKNX - Volatility Comparison

Eventide Gilead Fund (ETGLX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) have volatilities of 5.06% and 5.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETGLXKMKNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

5.22%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

19.34%

-4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

23.11%

-5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.23%

26.39%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.43%

23.63%

-0.20%

ETGLX vs. KMKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETGLX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than KMKNX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETGLX vs. KMKNX - Dividend Comparison

ETGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than KMKNX's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETGLX
Eventide Gilead Fund
11.06%12.58%1.29%0.00%5.53%6.47%0.81%3.21%5.41%0.00%0.00%1.14%
KMKNX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class
0.60%0.66%0.81%0.87%1.36%1.56%0.26%0.33%9.13%0.64%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETGLX and KMKNX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMKNX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to ETGLX (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETGLX dropped -41.41% vs KMKNX's -65.47%.

ETGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETGLX and KMKNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer