ETGIX vs. FEAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX).
ETGIX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 1, 1994. FEAAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 1994.
Performance
ETGIX vs. FEAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETGIX vs. FEAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund | -16.53% | -2.06% | 17.55% | 20.60% | -19.86% | 25.74% | 17.64% | 10.52% | -12.14% | 44.79% |
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A | 3.63% | 36.67% | 20.63% | 13.50% | -30.79% | -15.06% | 72.51% | 30.64% | -15.11% | 45.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETGIX achieves a -16.53% return, which is significantly lower than FEAAX's 3.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ETGIX has underperformed FEAAX with an annualized return of 7.44%, while FEAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.67% annualized return.
ETGIX
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- -16.53%
- 6M
- -14.58%
- 1Y
- -12.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.60%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
FEAAX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 36.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETGIX vs. FEAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETGIX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FEAAX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETGIX vs. FEAAX — Risk / Return Rank
ETGIX
FEAAX
ETGIX vs. FEAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETGIX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | 1.85 | -2.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | 2.41 | -3.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.35 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.69 | -3.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.87 | 9.59 | -11.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETGIX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 1.85 | -2.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.10 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.61 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.35 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETGIX and FEAAX is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ETGIX vs. FEAAX - Dividend Comparison
ETGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.33%, while FEAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund | 17.33% | 14.47% | 4.07% | 4.85% | 21.62% | 8.60% | 0.24% | 2.79% | 1.17% | 3.32% | 0.56% | 0.79% |
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.88% | 6.62% | 5.21% | 6.49% | 0.03% | 1.10% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
ETGIX vs. FEAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than FEAAX's maximum drawdown of -60.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETGIX and FEAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETGIX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.62% | -60.87% | -12.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.03% | -13.56% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.84% | -53.46% | +23.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.71% | -57.90% | +15.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.97% | -11.17% | -14.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.89% | -20.29% | -6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 3.81% | +3.02% |
Volatility
ETGIX vs. FEAAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) is 6.06%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) has a volatility of 10.18%. This indicates that ETGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETGIX | FEAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 10.18% | -4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 14.85% | -4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.29% | 20.43% | -6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 22.58% | -7.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 20.72% | -3.16% |