PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETG vs. EARRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETG vs. EARRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETG achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly higher than EARRX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, ETG has outperformed EARRX with an annualized return of 12.99%, while EARRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.66% annualized return.


ETG

1D
-1.45%
1M
4.27%
YTD
2.94%
6M
6.30%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
12.99%

EARRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.52%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
3.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETG vs. EARRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETG
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund
2.94%36.92%15.46%21.97%-27.62%33.08%10.08%43.62%-15.90%33.55%
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
1.58%5.46%5.39%5.95%-3.22%7.50%5.05%5.29%-0.49%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ETG and EARRX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.18

The correlation between ETG and EARRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETG vs. EARRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETG
ETG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ETG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ETG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

EARRX
EARRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EARRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EARRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EARRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EARRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EARRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETG vs. EARRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETGEARRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.57

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

4.84

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.47

18.23

-12.77

ETG vs. EARRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETG Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the EARRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETG and EARRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETGEARRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.55

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

1.32

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

1.35

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.07

-0.69

Drawdowns

ETG vs. EARRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETG drawdown since its inception was -74.76%, which is greater than EARRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETG and EARRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETGEARRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.76%

-10.27%

-64.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.64%

-0.79%

-15.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.95%

-1.18%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.64%

-6.39%

-25.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.53%

-10.27%

-41.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.10%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.48%

-1.08%

-12.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

0.21%

+3.98%

Volatility

ETG vs. EARRX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) at 0.49%. This indicates that ETG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EARRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETGEARRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

0.49%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

1.14%

+11.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

1.50%

+13.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.82%

2.77%

+17.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.25%

2.71%

+18.54%

ETG vs. EARRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETG has a 2.57% expense ratio, which is higher than EARRX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETG vs. EARRX - Dividend Comparison

ETG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than EARRX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
3.82%4.36%3.83%4.24%4.82%3.32%2.02%2.46%2.67%1.90%2.00%1.73%
ETG
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund
6.72%6.72%8.03%7.02%9.94%6.02%6.74%6.83%9.08%7.69%8.74%7.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETG and EARRX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to EARRX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETG dropped -74.76% vs EARRX's -10.27%.

EARRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETG and EARRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer