ETFT vs. UFO
ETFT (Fundsmith Equity ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ETFT is actively managed, while UFO is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETFT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.
Performance
ETFT vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETFT achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 30.00% return.
ETFT
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -17.74%
- YTD
- 30.00%
- 6M
- 30.00%
- 1Y
- 76.14%
- 3Y*
- 39.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- —
ETFT vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | -1.78% | 0.06% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 30.00% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFT and UFO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETFT vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
ETFT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UFO
ETFT vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETFT | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETFT vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFT drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFT and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFT | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.77% | -50.33% | +35.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -25.90% | +21.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -21.83% | +17.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.59% | — |
Volatility
ETFT vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETFT | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 41.38% | -26.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 30.81% | -15.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 31.27% | -16.10% |
ETFT vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETFT vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
ETFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.30% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETFT and UFO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETFT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETFT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.
UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for ETFT.
They also come from different issuers: Fundsmith and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ETFT and 0.75% for UFO.
Find the right allocation for ETFT and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer