PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETFT vs. SHEH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETFT vs. SHEH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETFT achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than SHEH's 25.94% return.


ETFT

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.19%
6M
-1.82%
YTD
-1.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

SHEH

1D
1.60%
1M
16.32%
6M
22.14%
YTD
25.94%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.74K$25.41K$19.24K
$787.46K$653.61K$317.20K

ETFT vs. SHEH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ETFT
Fundsmith Equity ETF
-1.19%0.06%
SHEH
Shell plc ADRhedged ETF
25.94%-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ETFT and SHEH is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETFT vs. SHEH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETFT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SHEH
SHEH Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SHEH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHEH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHEH Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SHEH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHEH Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETFT vs. SHEH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETFTSHEHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

ETFT vs. SHEH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETFT vs. SHEH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETFT drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum SHEH drawdown of -17.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFT and SHEH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETFTSHEHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.77%

-17.53%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

-2.90%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-4.14%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

Volatility

ETFT vs. SHEH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETFTSHEHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.82%

20.97%

-6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

20.55%

-5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.82%

20.55%

-5.73%

ETFT vs. SHEH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETFT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SHEH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETFT vs. SHEH - Dividend Comparison

ETFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHEH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%.


PositionTTM
ETFT
Fundsmith Equity ETF
0.00%
SHEH
Shell plc ADRhedged ETF
1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETFT and SHEH have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SHEH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SHEH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ETFT.

SHEH has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.00% for ETFT.

ETFT is categorized as Global Equities, while SHEH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fundsmith and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ETFT and 0.19% for SHEH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETFT and SHEH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer