ETFT vs. KLMT

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

ETFT (Fundsmith Equity ETF) and KLMT (Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ETFT is actively managed, while KLMT is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETFT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for KLMT.

Performance

ETFT vs. KLMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETFT achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly lower than KLMT's 11.46% return.

ETFT

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: -1.78%
• 6M: -1.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLMT

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: 11.46%
• 6M: 11.46%
• 1Y: 22.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETFT vs. KLMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF	-1.78%	0.06%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	11.46%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ETFT and KLMT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

ETFT vs. KLMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETFT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KLMT

KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 61
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 59
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETFT vs. KLMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETFT	KLMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.38	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.39	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.06	—

Drawdowns

ETFT vs. KLMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETFT drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum KLMT drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFT and KLMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETFT	KLMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.77%	-16.87%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.32%	-1.29%	-3.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-1.90%	-2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETFT	KLMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.17%	13.37%	+1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	15.98%	-0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.17%	15.98%	-0.81%

ETFT vs. KLMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETFT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than KLMT's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETFT vs. KLMT - Dividend Comparison

ETFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	1.77%	1.95%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETFT and KLMT in my portfolio?

ETFT and KLMT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETFT or KLMT?

On fees, KLMT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETFT or KLMT?

KLMT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ETFT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETFT or KLMT?

KLMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for ETFT.

What is the main difference between ETFT and KLMT?

They also come from different issuers: Fundsmith and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ETFT and 0.10% for KLMT.