ETFT vs. AVGV
ETFT (Fundsmith Equity ETF) and AVGV (Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETFT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for AVGV.
Performance
ETFT vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETFT achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 14.95% return.
ETFT
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGV
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 34.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETFT vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | -1.97% | -0.01% |
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF | 14.95% | 2.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFT and AVGV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETFT vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank
ETFT
AVGV
ETFT vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETFT | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 1.40 | -1.65 |
Drawdowns
ETFT vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFT drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum AVGV drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFT and AVGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFT | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.77% | -17.03% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.50% | -2.21% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -2.29% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.07% | — |
Volatility
ETFT vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETFT | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 13.13% | +2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 15.01% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 15.01% | +0.58% |
ETFT vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETFT vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison
ETFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF | 1.92% | 1.98% | 2.32% | 1.14% |
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETFT and AVGV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ETFT.
AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 0.00% for ETFT.
They also come from different issuers: Fundsmith and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ETFT and 0.26% for AVGV.
Find the right allocation for ETFT and AVGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer