ETFRX vs. UPAAX
ETFRX (North Square Tactical Defensive Fund) and UPAAX (Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ETFRX charges 1.86%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for UPAAX.
Performance
ETFRX vs. UPAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETFRX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 7.99%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
UPAAX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETFRX vs. UPAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETFRX North Square Tactical Defensive Fund | 0.59% |
UPAAX Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund | 3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFRX and UPAAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETFRX vs. UPAAX — Risk / Return Rank
ETFRX
UPAAX
ETFRX vs. UPAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund (UPAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETFRX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETFRX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 132.47 | -132.07 |
Drawdowns
ETFRX vs. UPAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFRX drawdown since its inception was -37.11%, which is greater than UPAAX's maximum drawdown of -0.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFRX and UPAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFRX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.11% | -0.25% | -36.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -0.08% | -6.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility
ETFRX vs. UPAAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETFRX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 21.58% | -11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 21.58% | -12.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.45% | 21.58% | -11.13% |
ETFRX vs. UPAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFRX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is lower than UPAAX's 2.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETFRX vs. UPAAX - Dividend Comparison
ETFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, while UPAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFRX North Square Tactical Defensive Fund | 0.45% | 0.48% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 2.25% | 0.00% | 3.02% |
UPAAX Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ETFRX and UPAAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for ETFRX and UPAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer