ETFRX vs. RQEIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ETFRX (North Square Tactical Defensive Fund) and RQEIX (RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, ETFRX returned 6.51%/yr vs 4.85%/yr for RQEIX. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ETFRX charges 1.86%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for RQEIX.

Performance

ETFRX vs. RQEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETFRX achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than RQEIX's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ETFRX has outperformed RQEIX with an annualized return of 6.51%, while RQEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.85% annualized return.

ETFRX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.30%
• 6M: 3.74%
• YTD: 6.24%
• 1Y: 14.62%
• 3Y*: 7.63%
• 5Y*: 4.35%
• 10Y*: 6.51%
• ALL TIME*: 4.61%

RQEIX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: 4.88%
• YTD: 6.63%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: 5.68%
• 10Y*: 4.85%
• ALL TIME*: 3.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETFRX North Square Tactical Defensive Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ETFRX vs. RQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETFRX North Square Tactical Defensive Fund	6.24%	8.44%	7.31%	5.65%	-8.28%	13.49%	3.99%	12.46%	-2.99%	15.26%
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	6.63%	14.97%	15.35%	20.27%	-17.06%	-8.45%	14.11%	7.53%	-6.02%	11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ETFRX and RQEIX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.58

Over the past year, ETFRX and RQEIX have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.58, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

ETFRX vs. RQEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETFRX

ETFRX Risk / Return Rank: 40
ETFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
ETFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
ETFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ETFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ETFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

RQEIX

RQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 85
RQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
RQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
RQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETFRX vs. RQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETFRX	RQEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.96	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	2.73	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.40	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	4.32	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.32	12.18	-5.87

ETFRX vs. RQEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the RQEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETFRX and RQEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETFRX vs. RQEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETFRX drawdown since its inception was -37.11%, which is greater than RQEIX's maximum drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFRX and RQEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETFRX	RQEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.11%	-33.25%	-3.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.02%	-4.26%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.98%	-17.96%	+5.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.17%	-28.82%	+16.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.30%	-33.25%	+11.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-2.35%	+0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.63%	-11.15%	+4.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	1.51%	+0.55%

Volatility

ETFRX vs. RQEIX - Volatility Comparison

North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) at 2.00%. This indicates that ETFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETFRX	RQEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	2.00%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.93%	7.53%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	9.37%	+1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.53%	16.79%	-7.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.47%	16.02%	-5.55%

ETFRX vs. RQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETFRX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than RQEIX's 1.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETFRX vs. RQEIX - Dividend Comparison

ETFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than RQEIX's 14.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETFRX North Square Tactical Defensive Fund	0.46%	0.48%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.38%	0.00%	2.25%	0.00%	3.02%
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	14.05%	14.53%	0.38%	0.00%	0.38%	0.00%	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETFRX and RQEIX in my portfolio?

ETFRX and RQEIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETFRX or RQEIX?

ETFRX has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to RQEIX (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETFRX dropped -37.11% vs RQEIX's -33.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RQEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.