PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETFRX vs. GOIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETFRX vs. GOIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETFRX having a 7.91% return and GOIIX slightly lower at 7.78%. Over the past 10 years, ETFRX has underperformed GOIIX with an annualized return of 6.81%, while GOIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.75% annualized return.


ETFRX

1D
0.24%
1M
4.41%
YTD
7.91%
6M
7.99%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
6.81%

GOIIX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.82%
YTD
7.78%
6M
8.46%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETFRX vs. GOIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETFRX
North Square Tactical Defensive Fund
7.91%8.44%7.31%5.65%-8.28%13.49%3.99%12.46%-2.99%15.26%
GOIIX
Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio
7.78%15.03%14.81%15.16%-15.86%12.65%12.73%19.16%-8.63%16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ETFRX and GOIIX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2006

0.87

The correlation between ETFRX and GOIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (5 years) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETFRX vs. GOIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETFRX
ETFRX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ETFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ETFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

GOIIX
GOIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GOIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GOIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETFRX vs. GOIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETFRXGOIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.87

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.34

12.67

-2.33

ETFRX vs. GOIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the GOIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETFRX and GOIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETFRXGOIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.37

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.72

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.78

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.55

-0.15

Drawdowns

ETFRX vs. GOIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETFRX drawdown since its inception was -37.11%, smaller than the maximum GOIIX drawdown of -43.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFRX and GOIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETFRXGOIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.11%

-43.63%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-7.17%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.98%

-12.19%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.17%

-23.78%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.30%

-25.07%

+3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-6.41%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.62%

+0.34%

Volatility

ETFRX vs. GOIIX - Volatility Comparison

North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) have volatilities of 2.71% and 2.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETFRXGOIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.65%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

6.99%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

8.69%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.44%

10.65%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.45%

11.27%

-0.82%

ETFRX vs. GOIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETFRX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than GOIIX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETFRX vs. GOIIX - Dividend Comparison

ETFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than GOIIX's 7.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETFRX
North Square Tactical Defensive Fund
0.45%0.48%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.38%0.00%2.25%0.00%3.02%
GOIIX
Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio
7.96%7.98%9.79%1.97%5.09%6.80%3.47%2.29%3.04%2.73%1.37%3.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ETFRX and GOIIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ETFRX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to GOIIX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETFRX dropped -37.11% vs GOIIX's -43.63%.

GOIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETFRX and GOIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer