ETEGX vs. RFIMX
ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) and RFIMX (Ranger Micro Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ETEGX returned 1.96%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for RFIMX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETEGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for RFIMX.
Performance
ETEGX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETEGX achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than RFIMX's 15.87% return.
ETEGX
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- -1.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
RFIMX
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 15.87%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 26.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
ETEGX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 2.02% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 11.28% | -15.52% | 21.45% | 12.73% | 27.57% | -1.07% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 15.87% | 1.99% | 11.52% | 9.14% | -24.26% | 30.58% | 44.44% | 24.94% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETEGX and RFIMX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between ETEGX and RFIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETEGX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank
ETEGX
RFIMX
ETEGX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETEGX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.26 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 3.20 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 9.02 | -9.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETEGX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 1.53 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.00 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.00 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
ETEGX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETEGX drawdown since its inception was -67.58%, smaller than the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETEGX and RFIMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETEGX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.58% | -99.41% | +31.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -9.11% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.98% | -99.41% | +79.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.30% | -99.41% | +75.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.91% | -99.12% | +89.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.77% | -29.26% | +6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 3.23% | +2.54% |
Volatility
ETEGX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) is 4.57%, while Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that ETEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETEGX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 5.79% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 13.68% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 19.11% | -3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 5,369.96% | -5,351.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 4,402.70% | -4,382.85% |
ETEGX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETEGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETEGX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison
ETEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than RFIMX's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 8.06% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 1.14% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 47.82% | 71.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETEGX and RFIMX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFIMX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to ETEGX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETEGX dropped -67.58% vs RFIMX's -99.41%.
RFIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETEGX and RFIMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer