ETEGX vs. QISGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) and QISGX (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ETEGX returned 8.17%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for QISGX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETEGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QISGX.

Performance

ETEGX vs. QISGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETEGX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than QISGX's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ETEGX has underperformed QISGX with an annualized return of 8.17%, while QISGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.

ETEGX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: -1.65%
• 3Y*: 4.76%
• 5Y*: 1.76%
• 10Y*: 8.17%

QISGX

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 1.44%
• YTD: 17.51%
• 6M: 17.13%
• 1Y: 42.60%
• 3Y*: 20.67%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: 13.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETEGX vs. QISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund	1.65%	-6.20%	14.65%	11.28%	-15.52%	21.45%	12.73%	27.57%	-6.00%	14.87%
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund	17.51%	17.72%	15.63%	19.63%	-27.94%	18.14%	29.91%	21.14%	-6.33%	25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ETEGX and QISGX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between ETEGX and QISGX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ETEGX vs. QISGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETEGX

ETEGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
ETEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ETEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ETEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ETEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ETEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

QISGX

QISGX Risk / Return Rank: 64
QISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETEGX vs. QISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETEGX	QISGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	2.19	-2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	3.14	-3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.42	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	3.40	-3.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	12.74	-13.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETEGX vs. QISGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETEGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the QISGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETEGX and QISGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETEGX	QISGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	2.19	-2.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.36	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.55	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.39	-0.12

Drawdowns

ETEGX vs. QISGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETEGX drawdown since its inception was -67.58%, which is greater than QISGX's maximum drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETEGX and QISGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETEGX	QISGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.58%	-60.75%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.05%	-13.23%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.98%	-27.28%	+7.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.30%	-38.60%	+14.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.66%	-45.08%	+8.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.24%	-1.53%	-8.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.76%	-13.88%	-8.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.79%	3.53%	+2.26%

Volatility

ETEGX vs. QISGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) is 4.45%, while Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that ETEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETEGX	QISGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	6.22%	-1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.11%	15.83%	-4.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	20.54%	-4.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.77%	24.48%	-5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.84%	24.69%	-4.85%

ETEGX vs. QISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETEGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than QISGX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETEGX vs. QISGX - Dividend Comparison

ETEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than QISGX's 3.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund	8.09%	8.23%	5.13%	0.68%	3.22%	13.87%	1.06%	7.19%	12.29%	11.02%	13.88%	23.25%
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund	3.33%	3.91%	0.00%	0.05%	3.63%	29.34%	0.45%	0.00%	7.03%	5.09%	1.61%	18.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETEGX and QISGX in my portfolio?

ETEGX and QISGX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETEGX or QISGX?

QISGX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to ETEGX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETEGX dropped -67.58% vs QISGX's -60.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QISGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.