ETEGX vs. CMCIX
ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, ETEGX returned -1.62% vs -0.28% for CMCIX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ETEGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETEGX achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than CMCIX's 2.66% return.
ETEGX
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- -1.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
CMCIX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- -0.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 2.02% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 7.66% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 2.66% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETEGX and CMCIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.98 |
The correlation between ETEGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETEGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
ETEGX
CMCIX
ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETEGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 0.09 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 0.20 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETEGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 0.07 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.34 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETEGX drawdown since its inception was -67.58%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETEGX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETEGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.58% | -21.50% | -46.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -11.68% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.91% | -9.96% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.77% | -6.45% | -16.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 4.99% | +0.78% |
Volatility
ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.90%. This indicates that ETEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETEGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 3.90% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 10.59% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 15.15% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 16.54% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 16.54% | +3.31% |
ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETEGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
ETEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than CMCIX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.14% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 8.06% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ETEGX and CMCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ETEGX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to CMCIX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETEGX dropped -67.58% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
CMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETEGX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer