PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETEGX vs. CMCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETEGX achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than CMCIX's 2.66% return.


ETEGX

1D
1.04%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
2.02%
6M
0.59%
1Y
-1.62%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
8.21%

CMCIX

1D
0.93%
1M
1.13%
YTD
2.66%
6M
1.11%
1Y
-0.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ETEGX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund
2.02%-6.20%14.65%7.66%
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
2.66%-5.28%10.46%7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ETEGX and CMCIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.98

The correlation between ETEGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETEGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETEGX
ETEGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ETEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ETEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCIX
CMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETEGXCMCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.02

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

0.09

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.04

0.20

-0.24

ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETEGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the CMCIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETEGX and CMCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETEGXCMCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

0.07

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.34

-0.06

Drawdowns

ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETEGX drawdown since its inception was -67.58%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETEGX and CMCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETEGXCMCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.58%

-21.50%

-46.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-11.68%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.91%

-9.96%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.77%

-6.45%

-16.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

4.99%

+0.78%

Volatility

ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.90%. This indicates that ETEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETEGXCMCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

3.90%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

10.59%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

15.15%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.77%

16.54%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

16.54%

+3.31%

ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETEGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETEGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison

ETEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than CMCIX's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
4.14%4.25%7.13%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETEGX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund
8.06%8.23%5.13%0.68%3.22%13.87%1.06%7.19%12.29%11.02%13.88%23.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, ETEGX and CMCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ETEGX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to CMCIX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETEGX dropped -67.58% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.

CMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETEGX and CMCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer